eagles123 Posted December 10, 2013 Report Share Posted December 10, 2013 Think I got this one wrong: red vs white [hv=pc=n&n=sj9h863daj85ca972&d=e&v=n&b=2&a=pp1cp1d1h]133|200[/hv] Firstly, what do you expect for 1H in this situation? and secondly, what do you bid with N hand when W bids 1S over 1H :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted December 10, 2013 Report Share Posted December 10, 2013 Think I got this one wrong: red vs white [hv=pc=n&n=sj9h863daj85ca972&d=e&v=n&b=2&a=pp1cp1d1h]133|200[/hv] Firstly, what do you expect for 1H in this situation? and secondly, what do you bid with N hand when W bids 1S over 1H :) Pd is a passed hand, so lacks the ability to open with a 1, 2 or 3 bid. Pd has less than 11 and a decent 5 card suit. Perhaps pd is 2 suited if we do not play 2 suited openings. As a result I content myself with a simple 2H Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfi Posted December 10, 2013 Report Share Posted December 10, 2013 Firstly, what do you expect for 1H in this situation? and secondly, what do you bid with N hand when W bids 1S over 1H :) There are times when you can overthink a hand, and this looks like one of them. I expect partner to have 5 hearts and overcall values. Since I have a 9 loser 10-count with three card support opposite a passed hand, I raise to 2H. If partner has 4 of them and it goes badly, or if partner has a magic hand to make game, then that's just too bad. I might double later in the auction, but I'm not taking a push to the 3 level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted December 10, 2013 Report Share Posted December 10, 2013 There are times when you can overthink a hand, and this looks like one of them. I expect partner to have 5 hearts and overcall values. Since I have a 9 loser 10-count with three card support opposite a passed hand, I raise to 2H. If partner has 4 of them and it goes badly, or if partner has a magic hand to make game, then that's just too bad. I might double later in the auction, but I'm not taking a push to the 3 level.All true except the doubling later part (well maybe a slam). I wouldn't even think about the overthinking thing, or any of the other concerns. I have a raise of an overcall, so I raise the overcall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CamHenry Posted December 10, 2013 Report Share Posted December 10, 2013 A hand with hearts that couldn't open. In more detail, I expect it to be:Lower than opening strengthToo impure to preempt (e.g. Axxx/KJTxxx/xx/x, or xx/KQJxx/xx/xxxx) (especially since partner's first call was second in, RvW). I have enough to raise here: it will push opponents much more than passing, so my bid is 2♥. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billw55 Posted December 10, 2013 Report Share Posted December 10, 2013 A hand with hearts that couldn't open.This. It should be a good suit vulnerable, and might have positional values based on the auction. Perhaps something like xxx KQJxx KTxx x. If this is from BBO, often the bidder will have a garbage 5-card suit, but just likes to bid regardless of vulnerability or even his hand. With a partner I trust, I bid 2♥. With a BBO random, I pass and hope he doesn't bid again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monikrazy Posted December 10, 2013 Report Share Posted December 10, 2013 1H should show 4-5 hearts, 8+ points. Occasionally partner may show up with a good 4 card heart suit with a 4333 hand of 11+ or similar hand lacking distributional strength. For instance a hand like Jx AQxx Qxxx Kxx may opt not to open. Raising to 2H is standard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenrexford Posted December 10, 2013 Report Share Posted December 10, 2013 2♥ seems semi-standout. Granted, though, partner is more likely to have a 4-card suit than in any other sequence, IMO, such that passing has some upside. I do not want a heart lead, and raising to 2♥ probably accomplishes nothing useful. An argument can be made (and I would make it) that this sequence allows me to make a fit-bid of sorts -- meaning a lead-director enabled by the fact of a fit. Hence, bidding 2♦ as "I have a fit but I want a diamond lead" makes sense here. Same for 2♣, perhaps, but 2♣ is probably needed as natural. Hence, perhaps 2♦ should actually say "I have a heart fit but don't want a heart lead?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts