MickyB Posted November 19, 2013 Report Share Posted November 19, 2013 I believe (1N)-2D-(P)-2S is usually played as, "to play opposite spades, invite+ opposite hearts" or "to play opposite spades, at least a preemptive raise of hearts". Wouldn't it be better to play it as "invite opposite either major"? The losses would come when we wanted to be in game opposite hearts but not spades, and partner actually has hearts. This seems exceedingly rare, as the opponents will nearly always compete to 2S on such hands. The advantage, of letting responder invite then stop in 2S, is surely much larger. Am I missing anything? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilKing Posted November 19, 2013 Report Share Posted November 19, 2013 Yes - the ox gets to play the dummy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endymion77 Posted November 19, 2013 Report Share Posted November 19, 2013 You have to be able to find a fit quickly regardless of partner's major. With your suggestion, you have to bid 2♥ with hearts which doesn't promise anything. You'll rarely have an invite for either major in the above sequence, but you'll often want to be able to preempt them if you have a fit and 2♠ showing hearts helps. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fromageGB Posted November 19, 2013 Report Share Posted November 19, 2013 If you are playing this method, then I think you need to have a separate bid, perhaps 3♦ as invitation in both. I would say the risk of going one off when you have a rare double invitation is less than the loss of being able to invite in the more common hearts alone. Perhaps 2NT or 3♣,with transfer replies so that the 1NT opener is on lead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lowerline Posted November 20, 2013 Report Share Posted November 20, 2013 I believe (1N)-2D-(P)-2S is usually played as, "to play opposite spades, invite+ opposite hearts" or "to play opposite spades, at least a preemptive raise of hearts". Wouldn't it be better to play it as "invite opposite either major"? The losses would come when we wanted to be in game opposite hearts but not spades, and partner actually has hearts. This seems exceedingly rare, as the opponents will nearly always compete to 2S on such hands. The advantage, of letting responder invite then stop in 2S, is surely much larger. Am I missing anything? 2nt is used as "invite opposite either major"... Yes, it would be nice to invite and still play on the 2-level when declined, but most of the time you cannot. I don't think making an exception here is worth the memory strain. Steven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLOGIC Posted November 20, 2013 Report Share Posted November 20, 2013 Nice idea, I'm going to suggest this to my one partner that I play 2D multi over their NT with... most likely he will think I'm nuts but it seems good to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MickyB Posted November 20, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 20, 2013 Great, let me know whether it works :P I know some play - X = pens2C = majors2D = good 2M overcall2M = bad 2M overcall With this refinement, that could become - 2D = good 2H overcall or any 2S overcall2H = bad 2H overcall2S = 4S,5+m2N = 4H,6+m Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.