Jump to content

usually question:how to bid


Recommended Posts

EW silent

1H-2D

2H-3C (fake suit to force to game)

3D-4D

4H (RKC)-4S (0 or 3)

4NT (ask Q)-6D (yes but no K)

p

 

Let's just hope I'm not playing matchpoints.

 

edit: actually I guess North could RKC over 3D, instead of hanging around with 4D, with controls in each suit he has no reason to hang around.

 

ahydra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Playing our version of weak no trump acol:

 

1-2 (10+, not GF)

2-3 (we play this forcing)

3(stop, no trump probe, no club stop)-4(cue, initially agrees for keycard)

4(high card cue)-4(keycard in hearts)

5(1/4)-5(Q?)

5(yes and K)-6

 

This is not perfect as partner might have a stiff K in a 4513 where a club lead causes a big problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me, 1 2(GF), 3 3 is choice of games so on this hand I am happy as South with a club singleton to rebid 3. Then North ace asks.

1 2(GF 5+)

3 4(ace ask)

4(one or three of five) 6

As South opened with no more than one ace, North takes a reasonable gamble on having K and being able to set up hearts if needed for club discards. Failing that, discarding on a spade may do, or there may be no club losers. But it is a gamble.

 

It is not sufficient for North to bid 4 because he cannot expect South to be able to see 12/13 tricks if his hearts are not solid. Playing in diamonds, North has to ask.

 

Easier if South rebids 2:

1 2

2 3

3("non-serious 3NT") 4(serious intent, asking for a control in diamonds)

4(A or K - never singleton or void in partner's suit) 4(ace ask)

4NT(one or three) 5(Q?)

5NT(yes,and K) 6

 

edit - but this, too, is risky as Cyberyeti points out. Not a perfect slam hand, but I think the North hand too good not to try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This auction exposes a potential problem in cuebidding methods that perhaps should be addressed. When Responder's 2/1 suit is one under Opener's suit, a fit cannot be established for Opener's major short of the three-level, which then means that any "cuebid" of Responder's first suit will usually be in the position of a Last Train call. Thus, the suit often most important to cuebid ends up buried in ambiguity.

 

Accordingly, it seems to me that in this auction type (whether 1-P-2 or 1-P-2 as the start), picture jumps should probably be relaxed substantially from what I usually use as defaults (very strictly defined picture jumps). With that modification (which I now think critical):

 

1-2(GF)

2-3(Picture splinter -- good (honor) heart fit, stiff, two of the top three diamonds)

 

This start lets Opener count 11 tricks, needing only a side Ace for the slam. 3NT serious would allow a club "control" of 4 (could be a King), after which 4 (Last Train) should get the slam bid (probably in diamonds if IMP scoring).

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thus, the suit often most important to cuebid ends up buried in ambiguity.

Is it not a simpler solution just to use Asking Bids instead? Now if you have an open side suit you can ask there and still find out about the second suit control situation later, or if not proceed directly to asking about the key suit. Either way you are going to be placed reasonably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 = up to 17, 5+ hearts, unbal

... - 1 = INV+ relay

1NT = min, 0-3 spades

... - 2 = GF relay

2 = 6+ hearts, no other 4 card suit

... - 2 = relay

2NT = 3 spades

... - 3 = relay

3 = 3 diamonds

... - 3 = relay

3NT = 3631

... - 4 = relay

5 = KQ + K + K, denies Q

... - 6NT

 

This time NT is conveniently right-sided.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it not a simpler solution just to use Asking Bids instead? Now if you have an open side suit you can ask there and still find out about the second suit control situation later, or if not proceed directly to asking about the key suit. Either way you are going to be placed reasonably.

That's a difficult question to answer, as it involves weights of entirely unrelated structures and thus too many questions. But, it seems that the core problem probably still exists because a common question to ask will involve the one-under suit. If you ask about that suit directly, you lose space to ask or show anything else. If you ask first about something else, you either lose lttc or lose showing the one-under or have ambiguity. If the idea is that you don't need lttc then there's no problem for you, but my comments are for those who want lttc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 = up to 17, 5+ hearts, unbal

... - 1 = INV+ relay

1NT = min, 0-3 spades

... - 2 = GF relay

2 = 6+ hearts, no other 4 card suit

... - 2 = relay

2NT = 3 spades

... - 3 = relay

3 = 3 diamonds

... - 3 = relay

3NT = 3631

... - 4 = relay

5 = KQ + K + K, denies Q

... - 6NT

 

This time NT is conveniently right-sided.

 

If you think the opps are going to leave you alone in this auction ... P-1-P-1-X/2-?-3(fit) or 4 etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you think the opps are going to leave you alone in this auction ... P-1-P-1-X/2-?-3(fit) or 4 etc

Indeed, (P) - 1 - (P) - 1; (X) - P - 3 would certainly make life much more awkward than in the undisturbed auction. Against that, I fancy our chances of picking up some juicy bonuses later in the match if the opp continues to double 1 level contracts with Axxxx and out without any knowledge of the way the suit is dividing (and they will get plenty of opportunities for such action).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed, (P) - 1 - (P) - 1; (X) - P - 3 would certainly make life much more awkward than in the undisturbed auction. Against that, I fancy our chances of picking up some juicy bonuses later in the match if the opp continues to double 1 level contracts with Axxxx and out without any knowledge of the way the suit is dividing (and they will get plenty of opportunities for such action).

 

We'd open the E hand 2 so you'd be really guessing :)

 

I'd only even consider the double as a passed hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3(stop, no trump probe, no club stop)

 

Interesting that you should mention this, I have been thinking recently about this exact situation which only really occurs when the level of the auction is at 3. You don't have enough room for all your probing: what do you do with a club stop but no spade stop? Also (slightly less of) an issue in auctions like 1S-1N-2D-3D-.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting that you should mention this, I have been thinking recently about this exact situation which only really occurs when the level of the auction is at 3. You don't have enough room for all your probing: what do you do with a club stop but no spade stop? Also (slightly less of) an issue in auctions like 1S-1N-2D-3D-.

 

 

wht is the range of 3d?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basically I came to my usual conclusion that stoppers are for children. ;)

 

I think it is wrong to use 3 as specifically "S stop, club doubt" and use it more generally as "doubt about NT" so you will bid 3S without a stop in either black suit or with a generally flimsy hand. With a stopper in one of them just bid 3NT; this gives less away and the opponents might not find the right lead anyway.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basically I came to my usual conclusion that stoppers are for children. ;)

 

I think it is wrong to use 3 as specifically "S stop, club doubt" and use it more generally as "doubt about NT" so you will bid 3S without a stop in either black suit or with a generally flimsy hand. With a stopper in one of them just bid 3NT; this gives less away and the opponents might not find the right lead anyway.

 

That's fine, but it's much more useful as we use it if you don't bid 3N in slammy auctions, partner will know to look at his clubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1H 2D

2H 3D

 

playing 2/1 seems normal to me even if 2H promised 6. It is still very likely we belong in diamonds if we have a slam. Over that I think south should bid 4C since he has a huge hand for diamonds. I do not think that that denies a spade control since 3S is an ambiguous bid, might just be trying for 3N etc which will muddy the waters greatly if partner doesn't bid 3N. North can then drive it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...