Jump to content

What Do These All Mean


eagles123

Recommended Posts

no opp bidding

 

1H - 1S - 1N - 3S

 

1H - 1S - 1N - 2C (checkback) 2m 3S

 

1H - 1S - 1N - 2C (checkback) 2m 2S

 

 

not sure what the difference is between all of these, 1H - 1S - 1N - 2S would be sign off btw

 

Seem to remember the difference between first and second is one is invitational and one is forcing but intrigued as to what the final sequence might mean.

 

Thanks,

 

Eagles

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's how I usually play them but might not be standard (2C always shows invitational hand at least):

 

1H - 1S - 1N - 2S

To play

 

1H - 1S - 1N - 3S

Invitational, 6+ spades

 

1H - 1S - 1N - 2C (checkback) 2m 3S

Sets trump, demands cuebid

 

1H - 1S - 1N - 2C (checkback) 2m 2S

Invitational with an unbalanced hand, does NOT promise more than 5 spades

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's how I usually play them but might not be standard (2C always shows invitational hand at least):

 

1H - 1S - 1N - 2S

To play

 

1H - 1S - 1N - 3S

Invitational, 6+ spades

 

1H - 1S - 1N - 2C (checkback) 2m 3S

Sets trump, demands cuebid

 

1H - 1S - 1N - 2C (checkback) 2m 2S

Invitational with an unbalanced hand, does NOT promise more than 5 spades

 

The third sequence may change if you play strong jump shifts, the first if you play WJS, I'm wondering what shape you would have with only 5 spades for the 4th, and what you play 1-1-1N-2-2-3m as ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Within an Acol context, the difference between the first and third sequences will normally be that the latter implies 3 hearts whereas the former denies this. I always thought this was a pretty silly part of NMF and that there ought to be better ways of using these sequences. I have not found a lot of good material for this either - it seems to be assumed that you will move onto 2-way by the time you start asking these questions. There is a little more available for 5 card majors of course.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO, the continuation structures (preferences) that we should have thoroughly discussed before using the 2C checkback should be in a different forum, regardless of how inexperienced the OP thinks he is.

 

But I will point out that 2m can only be 2, the bid itself should mean something, and the meaning of 2D in-turn might affect the meanings of the various continuations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...