Jump to content

One, brief direct bridge advice


Recommended Posts

Always take the action that allows you to blame your partner.

 

(Or to put it another way, trust your partner to know what she/he is doing. And if things go awry, don't actually blame her or him.)

 

 

This one seems to lead to why we don't have long term partner even those at the very top of bridge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your best one bit of bridge advice that you would like to pass on?

play!

 

---

 

this one bit relates to the 10,000 hours:

 

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/sportingscene/2013/08/psychology-ten-thousand-hour-rule-complexity.html

 

The point of Simon and Chase’s paper years ago was that cognitively complex activities take many years to master because they require that a very long list of situations and possibilities and scenarios be experienced and processed. There’s a reason the Beatles didn’t give us “The White Album” when they were teen-agers.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All your opponents are stupid. Winning is just a matter of being a bit less stupid than they are.

I wouldn't have seen you as someone who applies this advice particularly often judging by your "Clearly, LHO does not have the club Q as he would have played a spade back to take out the entry necessary for double squeeze early." posts :P

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never stop thinking - except when you are getting late play penalties.

The advice to international teams is more like:

Never stop thinking - even when you are getting late play penalties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't have seen you as someone who applies this advice particularly often judging by your "Clearly, LHO does not have the club Q as he would have played a spade back to take out the entry necessary for double squeeze early." posts :P

Yes, that's probably one of the many ways in which I'm more stupid than my opponents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never ask yourself: 'what should I do?' Instead, ask yourself: 'what's going on?'

 

Once you have figured out what is or what probably is going on, the other question has usually been answered or, if not, is far easier to answer now than it was.

 

This bit of advice incorporates a whole approach to the game, since you cannot figure out what is going on without remembering, and understanding, the bidding and without counting the hands during the play (and as one progresses, being able to draw primary, secondary and tertiary inferences from all of the above).

 

I first heard of this advice when reading Hamman's book, written with, IIRC, Manley.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never ask yourself: 'what should I do?' Instead, ask yourself: 'what's going on?'

 

Once you have figured out what is or what probably is going on, the other question has usually been answered or, if not, is far easier to answer now than it was.

 

This bit of advice incorporates a whole approach to the game, since you cannot figure out what is going on without remembering, and understanding, the bidding and without counting the hands during the play (and as one progresses, being able to draw primary, secondary and tertiary inferences from all of the above).

 

I first heard of this advice when reading Hamman's book, written with, IIRC, Manley.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...