Jump to content

Six Foot Two


Ambiguous?  

21 members have voted

  1. 1. What is partner up to?

    • Western Cue-bid
      7
    • Strong Spade Raise - Game Force
      3
    • Strong Spade Raise - Forcing to 3
      6
    • His Pass is Forcing
      13
    • Pass is not Forcing
      4
    • Something Else
      1


Recommended Posts

Partner has gf strength so his pass is forcing. I suppose some would bid 3 with a limit raise in spades but that is misguided - the 3 bid is overloaded enough already, and besides he shouldn't make an undiscussed bid with a hand that is suitable for an unambigous, natural call (in this case 3).

 

He might have 3-card spade support if you don't play support double. He could have a balanced 18-19 with two spades ad no heart stopper (or an anti-positional one) if you do play support doubles, but in that case he probably would have doubled 4. He could have either if you don't know if you play support doubles or not. In any case, he could have a strong 1-suiter.

 

If you double now he will probably pass although he might want to show a monster by using pass-and-pull. This will typically be a one-suiter with too little HCP strength for a 2 opening. Maybe something like Qx-(void)-KQx-AKQxxxxx.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has a big hand of some type (perhaps BAL, perhaps with spades, perhaps with lots of clubs), and 3H is initially asking for a stop in hearts. You replied with 3S, denying a stop in hearts. Given that he hasn't doubled 4H nor has he bid 4S, chances are that he has the long clubs, but I suppose he could have a 17 BAL-ish or similar with no stop in hearts and not enough aces and kings to comfortably double 4H.

 

He might also have something like KQxx - Kx AKxxxxx looking for slam in spades.

 

It would help to see your hand - maybe that offers some clues?

 

ahydra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 was a general force, asking primarily for a heart stop. In my opinion, it was forcing to 3 and no higher. So, I do not beileve that partner's pass over 4 is forcing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I would bid 5 with the hand shown. I'm not passing and I am not doubling, and I see no reason to bid my spades again. Twice is enough.

 

I don't see that partner can have spades. Over the 2 he could have bid 2,3 or 4. If he had only three he could have made a support double. If he had spades but with such strength that he also wanted to show a heart control then I can imagine him starting with the 3 but then the pass over 4 makes no sense to me. Cuing hearts and bidding 4 seems like a fine way to show a heart control, four spades, and a big hand.

 

So I think he has clubs and a big hand. I suppose I could bid a "pick a slam" 5NT, or I could just bid 6, my heart void should be useful, but I am a simple minded soul and will just show my clubs by bidding 5. If he can make six opposite this pile of stuff, he can bid 6.

 

I'm guessing that this hand is posted because it makes 6 or 7. And wasn't played there. Maybe I should bid more but really it seems there are a lot of losers. So I bid 5. Added: Also, since they have not played together before, partner absolutely cannot have spades. He simply cannot bid this way with a new partner when he has a clear way of showing spades. So forget spades. I bid some number of clubs, I choose 5.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whether 3 is forcing 1 round or to game might depend on partnership agreement. I prefer GF - something on the order of 21 Support Points or 4.5 losers.

NT, s and s are on the radar screen. The on ehand we know partner does not have is 7 running s and pointed suit stoppers.

For NT, we have to decide whether 3 asks (Western) or shows a NT stopper.

I like Auggie Boehm's suggestion "1 Ask, 2 Show". With two unbid suits by our side, a cue bid shows a NT control.

So, 3 shows a stop and expresses doubt about if partner is interested in NT.

 

In the given auction, the subsequent pass by North is forcing and denies first round control of (North would double to show the A).

South should double with transferable values, and bid 4 with more offense than defense. Here I'd bid 4, though double might be right.

 

If instead you choose to play 3 as Western asking for a stopper, then the subsequent pass is forcing with no wastage.

 

(Here South might have missed a step. South has a perfect hand for either black suit. Perhaps a 4 control bid (void) instead of 3 would be what North wants to hear).

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...