sieong Posted October 20, 2013 Report Share Posted October 20, 2013 [hv=pc=n&s=sq7632hk7dat53c98&d=w&v=n&b=12&a=3cp3nppp]133|200[/hv] What would you lead? Is Anthias and Bird's advice of banging down aces against NT the right move here, or taking the double dummy analysis too far? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted October 22, 2013 Report Share Posted October 22, 2013 Hi, if you go with the Ace, which may be Bird / Anthias, or not, you basically follow the common wisdom to lead Aces against a 3NT contract reached via a gambling 3NT opening bid. I think the situation are quite similar, most of the time the 3NT bidder will hold a honorin the opened suit, and 2-3 cards, making the suit solid.The 3NT bidder will usually have covered 2 out of 3 suits, and leading the Ace increases your chance of finding the hole.Against this: Leading something else, tries to find partners entry / Ace, so that he can play diamond from his side, i.e. we are basically betting, that diamond is the hole. Without the reference to Bird / Anthias, I may have choosen spade. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sieong Posted October 27, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 27, 2013 The full hand was [hv=pc=n&s=sq7632hk7dat53c98&w=sjhj85dj97ckqj642&n=st95ha6432d862cat&e=sak84hqt9dkq4c753]399|300[/hv] To beat the contract, we need to establish ♥ before ♣A is knocked out. A ♠ lead (which I made at the table) is an instant lost cause. A ♦A lead may work out, but one needs to work out to shift to a ♥ rather than a ♠ after the lead, which I am not sure if I will be able to work out at the table (any suggestions on signals?). That the ♠ lead works out so badly seems unlucky to me, but I wonder if in other people's experience, is Hxxxx a good or a bad holding to lead against 3X - 3NT auctions? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mbodell Posted October 28, 2013 Report Share Posted October 28, 2013 A ♠ lead (which I made at the table) is an instant lost cause. Actually the ♠Q still sets it since you can set up a spade trick to go with the 4 quick tricks, and opponent only gets 5 clubs and 2 spades before this happens. Not that you should lead that, although might be reasonable after banging down the diamond A (by which point it is too late). A good situation for Kit style suit preference high, suit preference low, and continue signal from partner on the diamonds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.