Jump to content

Any Bid Here


eagles123

  

33 members have voted

  1. 1. Any Bid



Recommended Posts

1st Choice: Pass 2nd Choice: Pass 3rd Choice: Pass

 

Don't like 1, even though I'm not opposed to 4 card overcalls at all. This is just sort of in that "uncanny valley" where you kinda want to bid again if partner makes some minimum noise, but you don't really have the values for it. Also xxx is v. bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is double so bad? If you get a 2 reply, you're unlikely to get left in, and it's not necessarily disastrous at MPs if you are. Otherwise, if partner has anything, you may get to push them to 3 which looks defensible.

 

1 guarantees 5 cards for me, so it's not a choice. If I pass, I find it difficult to see how partner will find anything intelligent. Giving up the partscore battle doesn't usually go well with that sort of hand at MPs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would certainly bid 1. If the red suits were reversed I would double.

 

I am not going to stay out of the auction with a good hand and a strong 4 card spade suit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thx folks, happy to admit I was wrong here :)

 

This happened in a post-mortem teaching session.

 

I chose to X. My thought was I had 4 of the other major, a pretty strong hand and if P was to bid 2D then it was fairly likely to be a 5 card suit so it was worth the risk. But I can see with no votes so far it was the wrong action!

 

Thanks,

 

Eagles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a clear double in the Intermediate/Advanced forum but I just can't bring myself to vote for it in the Novice/Beginner section, sorry.

 

Ah. so what would it be in the Expert forum??:huh:

 

But seriously, if it is the right call in the I/A forum why would it make a difference in the N/B?

 

I may be missing something, but I sort of gather that there is nothing especially complicated about the hand. It is just down to whether you expect to lose more by promising a 3rd Diamond that you haven't got with a double or by suggesting longer Spades than you have with a 1S overcall. Presumably if partner bids 2D opposite the double you stand it and hope that he has 5 of them or that it is no great disaster if he only has 4. No strange artificial followups are in the frame.

 

I don't have a strong opinion about which is better. I only insist that it is within partner's expected parameters. But I am a bit surprised by the comment if only because beginners are taught that overcalling on a 4 card suit is a bit of a no-no. Has you said it was a clear double in the N/B section but 1S in the I/A I would at least have understood the sentiment without necessarily agreeing.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would overcall 1S, but I'm not opposed to dbl. If I pass now, I've endplayed myself into passing if LHO bids 2H or 3H(wk) and it comes back to me, and that just feels wrong at pairs.

 

I sympathize with the NB/IA discussion here, but despite posting in NB, eagles is I. Plus I think telling a novice "look, we don't usually overcall 4 card suits, nor do we dbl with a doubleton in an unbid, but the conditions here are a perfect storm: we can make a cheap (1-level) overcall, we're overcalling a very chunky suit, we have a very good hand, we want a spade led or led back, and - perhaps most importantly - we rarely ever are checking out at the 2-level when opps have a fit, and passing now may really create a bidding problem for us on the next round," is totally fine.

 

I mean, I'm not totally convinced of how I should rate X, 1S, and P, but at least I can share the fundamentals (that I am fairly convinced are sound) that went into my decision, and those are valuable for a player of any skill level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah. so what would it be in the Expert forum??:huh:

How would I know, do I look like an expert or something? :P

 

Plus I think telling a novice "look, we don't usually overcall 4 card suits, nor do we dbl with a doubleton in an unbid, but the conditions here are a perfect storm: we can make a cheap (1-level) overcall, we're overcalling a very chunky suit, we have a very good hand, we want a spade led or led back, and - perhaps most importantly - we rarely ever are checking out at the 2-level when opps have a fit, and passing now may really create a bidding problem for us on the next round," is totally fine.

No doubt, except that what I would say is "I double with a doubleton in an unbid minor all the time, there's nothing wrong with it at all" and I'm not sure that is the right thing to teach beginners. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I double with a doubleton in an unbid minor all the time, there's nothing wrong with it at all" and I'm not sure that is the right thing to teach beginners. ;)

 

It isn't, but when beginners improve, they ask about hands that do not conform to the basics they were taught. And in that case it is generally right to give the "real" answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 guarantees 5 cards for me, so it's not a choice.

 

IMO, "guaranteeing" five cards does not necessarily mean that I have them, and does not mean that you shouldn't overcall if you think it's right. If partner is really rigid about this, there's always, "sorry, I had a diamond in with my spades".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO, "guaranteeing" five cards does not necessarily mean that I have them, and does not mean that you shouldn't overcall if you think it's right. If partner is really rigid about this, there's always, "sorry, I had a diamond in with my spades".

The problem is that partner will bid as though I have five. I don't want to be getting too high and going off in 3 or 4 if they can't make 3. A response structure that caters for partner overcalling with four isn't normal in the Acol environment in which the original question was set. Maybe other envronments have different response structures? Last time I looked at the vote, none of the 1 bidders were Acol players.

 

This is the N/B forum. I think answers should assume that partner is intermediate at most, and keep it rigorous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1S seems vastly superior to double, assuming we are using the doubles for takeouts, and appears to be the best bid available overall.

 

 

Like other posters have said, misrepresenting out diamond length is a major problem (and more so without any diamond honors).

 

1 - DBL - 3 (weak)

1 - DBL - 4 (weak)

 

In auctions like the above partner may put us in , counting on 3 or 4 card support and we can go down for major penalty.

 

Compare that to the downside of our partner playing us for an extra spade; partner can hardly be too upset seeing our full values for over-call. Moreover, we will frequently have space to slow down if partner has game-seeking values.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When partner bids like that he will have 6+ cards in diamonds basically always. With 54 in minors either way he has x or 4NT available and 5332 can shut up or double (responsive) but anyway that is very unlikely given our hand. We stand to lose a lot more if partner freely supports us on 3 cards amidst competition because he will not look for an alternative strain normally, not even with a 5- or 6-card side minor. Sure he can make a fit bid if you play that but most people play raises thereof as forcing..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that partner will bid as though I have five. I don't want to be getting too high and going off in 3 or 4 if they can't make 3. A response structure that caters for partner overcalling with four isn't normal in the Acol environment in which the original question was set. Maybe other envronments have different response structures? Last time I looked at the vote, none of the 1 bidders were Acol players.

 

This is the N/B forum. I think answers should assume that partner is intermediate at most, and keep it rigorous.

 

Yes overcalling with 4 isn't normally the done thing in Acol (at least at my level) but I can see why it might be the best bid due to the problem with diamonds :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that partner will bid as though I have five. I don't want to be getting too high and going off in 3 or 4 if they can't make 3. A response structure that caters for partner overcalling with four isn't normal in the Acol environment in which the original question was set. Maybe other envronments have different response structures? Last time I looked at the vote, none of the 1 bidders were Acol players.

 

This is the N/B forum. I think answers should assume that partner is intermediate at most, and keep it rigorous.

 

duplicate post

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...