Jump to content

every last one of them


Recommended Posts

I took a class on doubles from Mike Lawrence. I would double with this hand because I have support for all suits. 3n implies at least one and one half diamond stoppers. This hand has been played at least 15 times. Every one, 3nt down three. Over a double I bid 4 spades. I don't like stayman or a transfer over 3nt.

 

[hv=sn=orhst&s=S97432HA986D5CQJ3&wn=Robot&w=SHJT32DKJT9872CA8&nn=Robot&n=SAQJ5HKQ5DA64CKT5&en=Robot&e=SKT86H74DQ3C97642&d=s&v=o&b=11&a=P3D(Preempt%20--%207+%20D%3B%209-%20HCP%3B%205+%208421%20HCP%20in%20D%3B%206+%20total%20points)3N(2-5%20C%3B%202-5%20D%3B%202-5%20H%3B%202-5%20S%3B%2016-22%20HCP%3B%20stop%20in%20D)PPP&p=DQD5D2D6D3H8DKDAC5C2CQCADJD4C6S7D8S5S8S9D9H5C9H6DTCTH7S2D7SJSTS3C8CKC7C3HKH4H9HJHQS6HAH2S4HTSASKSQC4CJH3]400|300[/hv]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=sn=orhst&s=S97432HA986D5CQJ3&wn=Robot&w=SHJT32DKJT9872CA8&nn=Robot&n=SAQJ5HKQ5DA64CKT5&en=Robot&e=SKT86H74DQ3C97642&d=s&v=o&b=11&a=P3D(Preempt%20--%207+%20D%3B%209-%20HCP%3B%205+%208421%20HCP%20in%20D%3B%206+%20total%20points)3N(2-5%20C%3B%202-5%20D%3B%202-5%20H%3B%202-5%20S%3B%2016-22%20HCP%3B%20stop%20in%20D)PPP]400|300|

 

I took a class on doubles from Mike Lawrence. I would double with this hand because I have support for all suits. 3n implies at least one and one half diamond stoppers. This hand has been played at least 15 times. Every one, 3nt down three. Over a double I bid 4 spades. I don't like stayman or a transfer over 3nt.[/hv]

Over 3, IMO 3N = 10, Double = 9. 3N is unlucky because you can hold up your [DI}A twice and you have the ace or king in every other suit. Hence, in order to defeat you, the pre-emptor usually needs a side-suit ace as an entry.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

West hardly has a standard 2nd seat 3 opening - side 4 card major, two outside first round controls. Against most 3 openings, 3NT is a fine contract. But when an opponent makes a gambling bid (like 3 on that hand) sometimes the gamble pays off.

 

Agree with this, against most 3 bids, 3N is the right contract, very few humans with a void, a 4 card major and a rule of 20 hand will open 3.

 

How would you feel if partner had Kxxxx, Ax, xxx, QJx in 4 and the defence went K ace ruff, A, club ruff cash 2 more diamonds, partner ruffing the second to give opener a second club ruff with 3N cold ? Extreme examples like the actual hand are not so useful here, 3N is absolutely normal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not so easy to convert 4H to 3NT though. And partner could easily bid that on a 4 card suit.

I wouldn't be very worried about his bidding 4. He won't often have the values for it with only a 4-card suit, and I have A to protect us against a force.

 

I'd be more worried about 4, which he would bid with Kxx xxx xx QJxxx, where 3NT just depends on finding the aces where we expect them to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be very worried about his bidding 4. He won't often have the values for it with only a 4-card suit, and I have A to protect us against a force.

 

I'd be more worried about 4, which he would bid with Kxx xxx xx QJxxx, where 3NT just depends on finding the aces where we expect them to be.

 

 

It's not so hard to construct hands where he would. Take two of the spades in the example hand and put them into the club suit, for instance. Now 4H is a normal choice but 3NT is clearly better.

 

As you point out, 3NT also wins on many (probably most) hands where partner isn't going to bid a major.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not so hard to construct hands where he would. Take two of the spades in the example hand and put them into the club suit, for instance. Now 4H is a normal choice but 3NT is clearly better.

 

If you're bidding game with xxx Axxx x QJxxx I think 4 is the normal choice, or at least the right choice. To risk playing in a 4-3 fit with poor trumps, moderate values and the force coming in the wrong hand seems unwise when there's a good alternative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're bidding game with xxx Axxx x QJxxx I think 4 is the normal choice, or at least the right choice. To risk playing in a 4-3 fit with poor trumps, moderate values and the force coming in the wrong hand seems unwise when there's a good alternative.

 

Fair criticism - I overlooked that. Still not as good a game as 3NT though :).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

West hardly has a standard 2nd seat 3 opening - side 4 card major, two outside first round controls. Against most 3 openings, 3NT is a fine contract. But when an opponent makes a gambling bid (like 3 on that hand) sometimes the gamble pays off.

 

I think many players would open 3 with that hand.

We need a poll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...