Jump to content

Where are we going ?


Recommended Posts

This entirely depends if you play kickback.

Uhm... I would suggest you give serious consideration to discussing things like whether 3 here guarantees a fit before introducing kickback to your partnership. I mean, sheesh Yeti, do you really think this answer is helping anyone?

 

Whether 2 guarantees 5 hearts depends which flavour of ACOL you play but 3 surely must show 5-5, so I would agree that 3 sets trumps and 4NT is therefore RKCB.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uhm... I would suggest you give serious consideration to discussing things like whether 3 here guarantees a fit before introducing kickback to your partnership. I mean, sheesh Yeti, do you really think this answer is helping anyone?

 

Whether 2 guarantees 5 hearts depends which flavour of ACOL you play but 3 surely must show 5-5, so I would agree that 3 sets trumps and 4NT is therefore RKCB.

 

Well if you ever under any circumstances play kickback, 4 is clearly that so 4N is something else.

 

What do you do with a 4 small 225 18-19 with Hx or HH hearts ? I agree 3 suggests playing in hearts, but am not sure it categorically guarantees a "proper" fit.

 

2 guarantees 5 in most forms of Acol, 3 absolutely confirms 5-5.

 

I think with a pickup partner I just give my "2 without" 5 response which is unlikely to cause too much trouble if misinterpreted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

agree with the above, it is not really needed but for me 3 is 100% fit.

 

I'm not disagreeing just curious.

Does that mean showing 5-3 heart fit at the 3 level is more important than the right strain ?

I'm thinking of the possible 6-2 heart fit when spades might not be that well stopped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is everyone assuming a version of ACOL where 3 one round earlier (1H-2C-2D-3H) is non-forcing? Otherwise it would be crazy IMO to play 3 in the given auction as promising a fit. Are we really delaying the forcing raise with 3-card support to cater for the rare hand where opener is 4441??
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is everyone assuming a version of ACOL where 3 one round earlier (1H-2C-2D-3H) is non-forcing? Otherwise it would be crazy IMO to play 3 in the given auction as promising a fit. Are we really delaying the forcing raise with 3-card support to cater for the rare hand where opener is 4441??

 

This may not even be possible, while quite a few people open 1 with 4441, also plenty don't (we open 1).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cyberyeti is right to raise the possibility of kickback, because this is the IA forum, and if you are playing it 4NT can be spades voidwood.

 

But go back a bit. I take it the 2 limited opener's hand to say less than 17, so what is 3? If responder had 3 hearts he could just bid game or ace ask. If responder has 3 hearts, 3 is therefore inviting a cue bid, and 3 is the standout continuation on the hand. That wasn't bid, suggesting that cue bidding is not in the curriculum. So probably 3 shows just a doubleton, in case opener had 6, and 3NT is a suggestion to play. Therefore 4NT is inviting 6NT if opener has a 15 count.

 

If I was in this situation I pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cyberyeti is right to raise the possibility of kickback, because this is the IA forum, and if you are playing it 4NT can be spades voidwood.

 

But go back a bit. I take it the 2 limited opener's hand to say less than 17, so what is 3? If responder had 3 hearts he could just bid game or ace ask. If responder has 3 hearts, 3 is therefore inviting a cue bid, and 3 is the standout continuation on the hand. That wasn't bid, suggesting that cue bidding is not in the curriculum. So probably 3 shows just a doubleton, in case opener had 6, and 3NT is a suggestion to play. Therefore 4NT is inviting 6NT if opener has a 15 count.

 

If I was in this situation I pass.

Why go into NTs when a trump fit has been found????? The singleton club is an asset in a trump contract as a ruffing value

and a liability in NTs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why go into NTs when a trump fit has been found????? The singleton club is an asset in a trump contract as a ruffing value

and a liability in NTs.

I am attempting to decipher the bidding. If 3NT is natural, and not a spade cue when 3 would be the "serious 3NT" when hearts are trumps, then there is no good fit. North has black suit lengths equivalent to South's reds, and the strength to go with it, more strength than South.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...