VM1973 Posted August 29, 2013 Report Share Posted August 29, 2013 I agree with Mbodell. The hand rates at least 23 zar points and surely must be too strong for a simple 1♠-2♠ raise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdeegan Posted August 30, 2013 Report Share Posted August 30, 2013 :P 3♠ was my initial response w/o seeing the results. My reasoning was that unless partner can pick up spades and diamonds with only one combined loser, this mess will probably degenerate into a scramble hand. In that case 3♠ making four (because partner is such a good dummy player) ought to be an average or average plus board anyway. The actual hand happened to be a perfect fitter, so five spades is almost a laydown, and six is possible. Too bad you were not playing long suit game tries. Too bad your partner chose to take a monstrous underbid on this particular hand. With 17 gilt edged HCP and a singleton, simply bidding 4♠ is correct. Partner is good for nine tricks opposite ♠Kxx and the ♦10. The only possible reason for 3♥ is to hunt for an unlikely slam. In this case, you would end up in game anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mycroft Posted August 30, 2013 Report Share Posted August 30, 2013 I am another who may not accept. If partner doesn't have the ♠A, I expect that after he's told everyone we're crossruffing, we'll be doing it with one trump on the board. I tend to avoid making SSGT at Matchpoints, for that reason. I would be just blasting game with the North hand. It's a pity that I don't have a "I actually have a secondary diamond suit, does that help?" call - just a "need help in diamonds" or "short hearts" - but that hand's too strong for *any* game try. If I have to make one, it's 2NT - assuming that's "where can you accept a long suit try" - because the answer is "anywhere but hearts is good". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts