kgr Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 MPsAll Vulnerable[hv=pc=n&s=sqjt2h85dj6ct8642&d=w&v=2&b=11&a=1d(4+)2c(4cS%20and%20longer%20C)2h(non-forcing)]133|200[/hv]Your partners 2♣ bid showed a 4c♠ and 5+c♣. Strength similar to a one-level overcall and depending on distribution, 7 to 17 HCP.Opps: 1♦ was a 4c+♦ ; and 2♥ was non-forcing.2NT and 3♦ are good raises of ♣ and ♠. Direct raises are preemptive.You bid? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TylerE Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 4♣ sounds like a standout. I don't think 2♠ buys it and I don't want the opponents to have an easy guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArtK78 Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 4♣ sounds like a standout. I don't think 2♠ buys it and I don't want the opponents to have an easy guess.All vulnerable. Jumping to the 4 level looks like a good way to go for a number opposite nothing (or opposite very little). I want a spade lead and I have spade support. I will venture 2♠ but nothing more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgr Posted August 8, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 Thank you for the answer. Actual NS hands and bidding: MPsAll Vulnerable[hv=pc=n&s=sqjt2h85dj6ct8642&n=sa873h2da52cak973&d=w&v=2&b=11&a=1d(4+)2c(4cS%20and%20longer%20C)2h(non-forcing)3c4h5cppp]233|200[/hv]Bidding:- 1♦ was a 4c+♦- 2♣ bid showed a 4c♠ and 5+c♣. Strength similar to a one-level overcall and depending on distribution, 7 to 17 HCP.- 2♥ was non-forcing- 3♣ preemptive (no very clear agreements on this, but I assume that 2NT is still a good ♣-raise and 3♦ would be a good ♠-raise.South did bid 3♣, planning to show his spade support the next round.North did bid 5♣, assuming that he would make only 3 tricks in defense.Comments welcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArtK78 Posted August 8, 2013 Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 4♠ will make against any 3-2 spade break and clubs 2-1. 5♣ requires 2-1 clubs and no spade loser. I suspect that partner will bid 4♠ over my 2♠ bid if he bid 5♣ on the actual auction. 4♥ is likely to make anytime 4♠ fails, so it is not that bad unless something really ugly happens - like 5-0 spades. Even then you should be able to scramble for 8 tricks in spades. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAce Posted August 8, 2013 Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 4♣ sounds like a standout. I don't think 2♠ buys it and I don't want the opponents to have an easy guess. I don't get it. You have a toy which allows you to show 4♠ and 5 ♣, and your pd has 4 card spades and he is not bidding them ? Especially when he decided to play at 4 level ? MP ? And it is stand out huh ? I mean cmon, it is hard to find secondary 4-4 major fit in normal methods after 2/1 minor over call (at least harder than using the toy OP has) Now that it comes, and we have a 4-4 spade fit, but we fall in love with clubs ? Is it because this is in forums or are you bidding like that in real life too ? I hope it is the former.http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted August 10, 2013 Report Share Posted August 10, 2013 Bidding anything but 4♠ is beyond me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts