dake50 Posted August 8, 2013 Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 Pavlicek assumes the 1Nt:10-12 must still invest in Stayman, etc to search for M-fit.Of course IF 2-level bids MUST look for M-fit AND get too high opposite 10-12 THAT scheme loses. Let 1Nt:10-12 already assess missing M-fit before he opens 1Nt! So take out all those up-level bids. Now test its IMP gain/loss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilKing Posted August 8, 2013 Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 Pavlicek assumes the 1Nt:10-12 must still invest in Stayman, etc to search for M-fit.Of course IF 2-level bids MUST look for M-fit AND get too high opposite 10-12 THAT scheme loses. Let 1Nt:10-12 already assess missing M-fit before he opens 1Nt! So take out all those up-level bids. Now test its IMP gain/loss. Where does he assume that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.