jillybean Posted July 29, 2013 Report Share Posted July 29, 2013 [hv=pc=n&s=sjt963hk65dj832c9&w=saq8hqjtd97cakt75&n=sk4ha972dakq5cqj6&e=s752h843dt64c8432&d=n&v=n&b=5&a=1dp1s2c2np3cd3dppp]399|300[/hv] lead 8♣ tricks - 10 Other table, uncontested auction1D 1S2N 3C (relay to 3D)3H 3N lead ♣2 tricks = 8 -6imps Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lycier Posted July 29, 2013 Report Share Posted July 29, 2013 Whatever it is a uncontested or contested auction,both were easier to bid 3♣ as a final contract if Wolff signoff convention was applied I think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArtK78 Posted July 29, 2013 Report Share Posted July 29, 2013 3♣ at our table was New Minor Forcing. There just are not 9 tricks available. I suspect that JEC and Versace would have arrived in 3NT if it were not for the opposition bidding. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted July 29, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2013 3♣ at our table was New Minor Forcing. There just are not 9 tricks available. I suspect that JEC and Versace would have arrived in 3NT if it were not for the opposition bidding.The 3♣ bid was alerted as a relay to diamonds, was this perhaps intended as the start of a signoff and not NMF? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArtK78 Posted July 29, 2013 Report Share Posted July 29, 2013 The 3♣ bid was alerted as a relay to diamonds, was this perhaps intended as the start of a signoff and not NMF?I don't understand the alert as a "relay to 3D." We do not play that. It should be NMF.Note the 3♥ response. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.