hrothgar Posted July 27, 2013 Report Share Posted July 27, 2013 Relay Responder♠ A6543♥ 3♦ AKQ7♣ 976 Relay Asker♠ KQ2♥ AQT94♦ 82♣ AKJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrothgar Posted July 27, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 27, 2013 Relay Responder♠ A6543♥ 3♦ AKQ7♣ 976 Relay Asker♠ KQ2♥ AQT94♦ 82♣ AKJ MOSCITO auction 3♥ - 4♦4♥ - 4N5♣ - 5♦5♥ - 5♠5N - 6♣6♠ 3H asks for slam points4♦ shows 94H starts the scan4N shows 1-2 controls in Hearts and 0-3 in DiamondsAt this point in time, RR is marked with A of Spades and AKQ of Diamonds 5C asks in clubs5D shows 0-3 controls in Clubs5H asks in Spades5S shows 1 spade control5N asks in Diamonds6C denies the Jack of DiamondsAt this point in time, further searches for the grand seem unreasonable so relay captain places the contract (and hopes that RR doesn't have the stiff K of Hearts) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awm Posted July 27, 2013 Report Share Posted July 27, 2013 ... 3♦ (shape)3♥ - 4♦ (QP ask, 9QP)4♥ - 5♣ (ask, one or three top spades and one or three top diamonds and zero or two top clubs) This means Axxxx x AKQx xxx plus maybe some jacks. I'm glad to have the knowledge that partner doesn't have ♥K. 6♠ - Pass Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
straube Posted July 27, 2013 Report Share Posted July 27, 2013 Relay Responder♠ A6543♥ 3♦ AKQ7♣ 976 Relay Asker♠ KQ2♥ AQT94♦ 82♣ AKJ Straube 3♥-4♦ QP ask, 94♥-5♣ PCB, odd spades with odd diamonds but even clubs5♦-5N ask, small heart w/ SA or SQ but no SJ6♠ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbforster Posted July 27, 2013 Report Share Posted July 27, 2013 Relay Responder♠ A6543♥ 3♦ AKQ7♣ 976 Relay Asker♠ KQ2♥ AQT94♦ 82♣ AKJ...3♦ 5143 GF3♥-4♦ QP; 94♥-4N 1-2♠, AKQ♦ (can't be none) (this shows the given hand, up to jacks)6♠ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrecisionL Posted July 27, 2013 Report Share Posted July 27, 2013 Relay Responder♠ A6543♥ 3♦ AKQ7♣ 976 Relay Asker♠ KQ2♥ AQT94♦ 82♣ AKJ Ultra Club Relay / Copious Canape Club (C3) Same sequence as #4, the Q♦ can not be found and since ♦ are only 4-cards, the fit is less important. 1♣ 16+ - 1♥ = 4+ ♠ or 4♠ & 5♣/♦1♠ RELAY - 2♥ = 5♠ & 4♣/♦2 ♠ RELAY - 3♦ = 5=1=x=x3♠ BETA - 4♠ = 5 controls (missing 1 red K)5♦ CAB - 6♥ = AK♦ (missing K♥)6♠ May need flat distribution Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benlessard Posted July 27, 2013 Report Share Posted July 27, 2013 3H--4C (S kc, 2noQ)4D--4S (Kd, yes but no Kc) 4Nt--5D (QD ? yes but no QC)5H --5S (extras ?--no)7S (mp and 6S imps) if north has K of H ill play 7nt. idem for method 2. In CC i finish also in 3D. 1C-1H-1S-2C-2D-2H*-2S-3D 5143 2H is a reverser S longer or equal that D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akhare Posted July 27, 2013 Report Share Posted July 27, 2013 Relay Responder♠ A6543♥ 3♦ AKQ7♣ 976 Relay Asker♠ KQ2♥ AQT94♦ 82♣ AKJ ...3♦ With the weak doubleton and a 2 outside losers, it's difficult to see us going anywhere without some Ace power. However, if we RKC, we might in over our heads at the 5-level, so it's seems best to use the QP ask. ...3H...4♦ (QP ask; 9 QPs)...4♥...4N (DCB; ♠ control, AKQ of ♦ or nothing)...6♠ (can't picture 9 QP hand without AKQ of ♦+A♠) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sieong Posted July 28, 2013 Report Share Posted July 28, 2013 (PCB with control parity) 3♥ - 4♦ (QP? - 9QP)4♥ - 4N (control parity? - odd, even KQJ in ♠) At this point, responder possible hands are: Axxxx j AKQj xxx, Axxxx j AKjx Qxx, Axxxx K AQjx xxx, Axxxx K Ajxx Qxx. All hands are safe for small slam, with the first hand holding DJ has some minor chances for 7 (I would go for it needing a swing, I rate it at about 60% (68% for 3-2 break + HK coming down in three rounds or C finesse or H-C squeeze (I estimate this to be about 85%); higher with SJ, which has already been denied). 5♣ - 5♦ (D parity? - even KQJ in ♦)6♠ This hand reveals a flaw in the method, that it cannot differentiate between Axxxx J AKQx xxx vs Axxxx K AQJx xxx. Did not matter here but there will certainly be hands where it would. Maybe instead of PCB, one should use DCB with TOSR rules over KQJ instead of KQJ parity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted July 29, 2013 Report Share Posted July 29, 2013 Same as Richard. This hand shows again that it's very annoying not to know if the singleton is a top honor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.