Jump to content

personal attacks on BBO forums


glen

Recommended Posts

Quite a lot has been said here about me but I will engage someone in a debate until they convince me that they have a better way of doing things. Before you say that I am inconvincible, just recently I gave the thumbs up to fromageGB for a weak 2 continuation sequence which I thought was simple, effective and required very little memory load. Then Vampyr also gave a suggested continuation sequence after a strong 2 opening. Again it’s simple and doesn’t require much memory load. I have incorporated both into my own agreements.

 

On the downside we have the Puppet Stayman sequence as an example. Unless you come up with something more convincing, Puppet Stayman is a loser.

What do I gain with PS?

1. I can include 5-card majors in my 1NT bid if it falls in the range

What do I lose with PS?

1. An immediate 2/1 GF auction (although this won’t be a problem because you will get to game anyway, but with the GF auction initiated, your mindset changes towards the bidding while looking for the best spot to play)

2. The ability to raise immediately to level 4 with a weak hand but long in trumps

3. Splinter bids

4. Bergen raises

5. Fit jumps

6. Jacoby 2NT

7. Jacoby 3NT

And an even bigger downside, additional memory load to uncover a possible 5-3 or 4-4 fit in the major.

 

Another downside not off the table yet we have 2NT for 5-5 in the minors, 5-10 HCP.

What do I gain? The entire 1 and 2 levels have been taken away from the opponents.

Downsides? I gave a whole list in the thread with a request that all who play the bid give me their reasons for doing so. Thus far not a single one has responded.

 

I don’t really care what you think about my posting style, but from the number of views and the number of replies to many of those threads, it should be pretty obvious to my most vehement opponents that they generate a lot of interest.

 

I haven’t finished debating some of those threads, most notably The Muiderberg Hoax. If you’re following them, you will soon see me back there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do I gain with PS?

1. I can include 5-card majors in my 1NT bid if it falls in the range

And several other things mentioned by others and misunderstood/misconstrued/ignored by you in the thread. Anyway your post is making some category errors too but let's leave it at that since this is not a bridge thread.

I don’t really care what you think about my posting style, but from the number of views and the number of replies to many of those threads, it should be pretty obvious to my most vehement opponents that they generate a lot of interest.

Nicki Minaj has much more views than Hilary Hahn on Youtube (3.9M subscribers compared to 10k).

I haven’t finished debating some of those threads, most notably The Muiderberg Hoax. If you’re following them, you will soon see me back there.

We already knew that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I haven't finished debating some of those threads, most notably The Muiderberg Hoax. If you're following them, you will soon see me back there.

 

 

What is debating?

What is a (good) debate? A debate is an organized clash of good ideas. Each side employs worthwhile evidence to promote their viewpoint and to rebut the "flawed" evidence advanced by the other side. Debating is a formal intellectual contest and there are endless ways it can be played.

 

Look at the words and phrases used in the above quote: "organised, good ideas, worthwhile evidence, formal intellectual contest."

You don't debate!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm recommending not to ban, not to warn, just remove personal attacks from the site. It's simple and effective.

I don't think the mods (whether volunteers or staff) should honour the trolls by spending their resources on editing their posts. If someone posts a single TOS-violating post, the time it takes to delete it is plenty - actually since they also have to write about it in the notice thread, it is more than plenty.

 

Of course editing is praisworthy when someone makes an otherwise valuable post containing a TOS-violationg in an isolated sentence. But ...

 

And if someone posts dozens of TOS-violating posts then again, I don't think mods should spend resources on things like grace period, justifying the actions elaborately etc. Just give the troll a single warning and ban him/her next time.

 

But OK it is their decision.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Victor Mollo is doing his bit to bring about reconciliation in the forums. He wrote about two of the characters in these forums. You can see more here.

 

He is doing the opposite. I was fine with this:

My dog has misplayed a number of hands on BBO recently and has come up with some idiotic ideas on bidding theory. I caught him smoking some noxious chemical substances recently...

 

But now I think the hog was referring to me :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does the software allow for quick moderation of offending posts such as disemvowelling? That would streamline the process considerably in a number of ways.

 

I always liked puzzles :)

 

I had no idea this was used on forums before you posted this, I never saw a post moderated that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does the software allow for quick moderation of offending posts such as disemvowelling? That would streamline the process considerably in a number of ways.

Disemvowelling? Sounds extremely painful. But if you mean removing all of the vowels from a post, that would be an interesting form of moderation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disemvowelling? Sounds extremely painful. But if you mean removing all of the vowels from a post, that would be an interesting form of moderation.

 

That's exactly it. Teresa Nielsen-Hayden came up with it. You can see that someone broke the TOS, and who, and if you really want to know what they said you can figure it out, but most people won't bother, so the message they worked so hard to send gets snuffed without mercy. But it'd be tedious, especially with long posts, if the software won't automate it for the mods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, ther's no disemvoweling feature here that I know of. Mods can edit posts, but we just see the same editor options you do. I could, of course, copy the post to an editor or word processor, with which I could perform more complex transformations.

 

I'd also never heard of the word before. I know that it's often done to 4-letter words to make them acceptable on TV, I'd never heard of doing it to an entire post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the Wikipedia page on the topic: "Xeni Jardin, co-editor of Boing Boing, said of the practice, 'the dialogue stays, but the misanthrope looks ridiculous, and the emotional sting is neutralized.' Also, Boing Boing producers claim that disemvoweling sends a clear message to internet forums as to types of behavior that are unacceptable."

 

There's a Web tool here.

 

So if some mod decided my last post violated the TOS they could quickly run it through that tool and produce

 

Tht's xctly t. Trs Nlsn-Hydn cm p wth t. Y cn s tht smn brk th TS, nd wh, nd f y rlly wnt t knw wht thy sd y cn fgr t t, bt mst ppl wn't bthr, s th mssg thy wrkd s hrd t snd gts snffd wtht mrcy. Bt t'd b tds, spclly wth lng psts, f th sftwr wn't tmt t fr th mds.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the downside we have the Puppet Stayman sequence as an example. Unless you come up with something more convincing, Puppet Stayman is a loser.

 

It doesn't follow that because you are not playing Puppet Stayman (or any kind of 5-card Stayman) you will not open 1NT with a 5-card major.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever we think of 32519's abilities and style, we have to give him credit for transforming a fairly dry topic on bidding into a flame-war any water-cooler addict would be happy to join. I confess I would not have had the bottle.

 

Actually I think we are wrong. 32519 is not acting the village idiot, he is playing the court jester. He has paid back some put-downs, rattled a fair number of cages, stirred up a degree of controversy, and I suspect he has enjoyed it all immensely.

 

Returning to the OP, I would like to see the standard of BBO debate rise above that of an Australian state parliament but I think the mods are doing everything we can expect of them, doing a good job of balancing topic flow against propriety. I am not really sure I would like to see our more colourful posters banned - the fora would be duller for it - perhaps occasionally curbed. :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...