Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am in the process of writing an article for the Bridge World concerning some of the topics that we have been discussing here; namely, continuations following auctions such as 1 - 1 - 2 and 1 - 1 - 2.

 

I am citing new minor forcing, 4th suit forcing and 2/1 as examples of conventions that utilize a low-level force for exploratory bidding. Does anyone know who invented these systems?

 

Thank in advance.

 

BTW, as soon as I have a workable draft, I will post it. I'm seeing Joe Kivel on 1/18 and I want him to review it first-hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought both treatments were part of the 5 card major - western style Mr. Walsh espoused in the late '60's?

 

If memory serves, NMF came about due to an acronym he and Rhoda used.

 

Maybe we should ask her? :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought both treatments were part of the 5 card major - western style Mr. Walsh espoused in the late '60's?

 

If memory serves, NMF came about due to an acronym he and Rhoda used.

 

Maybe we should ask her? :-)

I dont know how much Rhoda had to do with the development of Walsh, in spite of her name.

 

My first reference to NMF was in an ancient Bridge World from the 1960's. The problem was the classic one: 11 count with a 5 and 4 and you had to rebid after 1 - 1 - 1N. A 2 call was referred to by one panelist as a "Petty Little Odious Bid". So, NMF's early nickname was "P.L.O.B.", as a matter of fact that is what was on one of my first cc's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IIRC, "PLOB" was the critical name ascribed to NMF by Sonny Moyse, the former editor (till 67) of TBW and then MSC moderator.

 

It's not really right to ascribe 2/1 solely to Walsh and his colleagues. It was a logical evolution from Al Roth's Roth-Stone and also Kaplan-Sheinwold, both of which used 1NT as a 1 round force and 2/1 as GF or almost FG. This was recognized by the fact this system was called "five card majors western style" in an early edition of Max Hardy's book. Of course it certainly is true that Walsh and his associates had a major influence on the evolution of 2/1. In my case I was an undergrad at Caltech in the late 60s (majoring in bridge, and occasionally studying geophysics) and Hal Kandler (who was part of the "Walsh crowd") helped me get started on 2/1. (I had already played K/S as a high school student in NYC.)

 

So I think any article on this stuff should make clear that these systems evolved in a natural way based on the contributions of many many people over a fairly long period of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...