pclayton Posted January 13, 2005 Report Share Posted January 13, 2005 I am in the process of writing an article for the Bridge World concerning some of the topics that we have been discussing here; namely, continuations following auctions such as 1♣ - 1♥ - 2♣ and 1♥ - 1♠ - 2♦. I am citing new minor forcing, 4th suit forcing and 2/1 as examples of conventions that utilize a low-level force for exploratory bidding. Does anyone know who invented these systems? Thank in advance. BTW, as soon as I have a workable draft, I will post it. I'm seeing Joe Kivel on 1/18 and I want him to review it first-hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted January 14, 2005 Report Share Posted January 14, 2005 walsh was the real inventor of 2/1, although hardy was the one who wrote the book. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted January 15, 2005 Author Report Share Posted January 15, 2005 walsh was the real inventor of 2/1, although hardy was the one who wrote the book. Yes, I knew about Richard Walsh; was more curious about NMF and 4SF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keylime Posted January 16, 2005 Report Share Posted January 16, 2005 I thought both treatments were part of the 5 card major - western style Mr. Walsh espoused in the late '60's? If memory serves, NMF came about due to an acronym he and Rhoda used. Maybe we should ask her? :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MickyB Posted January 16, 2005 Report Share Posted January 16, 2005 According to Bridgeguys 4SF was introduced by Norman Squire. My impression was that it evolved from a semi-natural bid to a totally artificial one. There is a reasonably well known quote by a top player complaining about this change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted January 16, 2005 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2005 I thought both treatments were part of the 5 card major - western style Mr. Walsh espoused in the late '60's? If memory serves, NMF came about due to an acronym he and Rhoda used. Maybe we should ask her? :-) I dont know how much Rhoda had to do with the development of Walsh, in spite of her name. My first reference to NMF was in an ancient Bridge World from the 1960's. The problem was the classic one: 11 count with a 5♠ and 4♥ and you had to rebid after 1♣ - 1♠ - 1N. A 2♦ call was referred to by one panelist as a "Petty Little Odious Bid". So, NMF's early nickname was "P.L.O.B.", as a matter of fact that is what was on one of my first cc's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geller Posted January 18, 2005 Report Share Posted January 18, 2005 IIRC, "PLOB" was the critical name ascribed to NMF by Sonny Moyse, the former editor (till 67) of TBW and then MSC moderator. It's not really right to ascribe 2/1 solely to Walsh and his colleagues. It was a logical evolution from Al Roth's Roth-Stone and also Kaplan-Sheinwold, both of which used 1NT as a 1 round force and 2/1 as GF or almost FG. This was recognized by the fact this system was called "five card majors western style" in an early edition of Max Hardy's book. Of course it certainly is true that Walsh and his associates had a major influence on the evolution of 2/1. In my case I was an undergrad at Caltech in the late 60s (majoring in bridge, and occasionally studying geophysics) and Hal Kandler (who was part of the "Walsh crowd") helped me get started on 2/1. (I had already played K/S as a high school student in NYC.) So I think any article on this stuff should make clear that these systems evolved in a natural way based on the contributions of many many people over a fairly long period of time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geller Posted January 18, 2005 Report Share Posted January 18, 2005 iirc (probably not, as it's over 30 yrs ago) the "PLOB" call of 2D being criticized by MSC moderator Moyse was a call made by panelist John Swanson. Can anyone either confirm or correct this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted January 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted January 18, 2005 iirc (probably not, as it's over 30 yrs ago) the "PLOB" call of 2D being criticized by MSC moderator Moyse was a call made by panelist John Swanson. Can anyone either confirm or correct this? I'll see John tonight; I'll ask him ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted January 19, 2005 Report Share Posted January 19, 2005 I believe there already have been articles about these auctions (Bourke Relay?). I assume you have already looked at those, but if you haven't, you should. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted January 19, 2005 Author Report Share Posted January 19, 2005 Yes I've read about the Bourke relay; its OK, but I think my system is better :) Swanson said it was Al Roth who developed NMF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.