Fluffy Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 ♠KJxxxx♥109xx♦xx♣x (4NT)-pass-(6♦)-all pass 4NT is minors, they are favourable. your turn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 ♣ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TylerE Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 Would help to know what 4N means. Minors I'm assuming? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArtK78 Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 Edited. A spade lead is not unreasonable. A decision has to be made. What are the odds that partner has the ♣A and can give me a ruff or, alternatively, the ♦A and can give me a ruff as opposed to the odds that we can cash or set up a spade trick which will cash before partner's hypothetical trump trick is dislooged. I can't really decide between a club and a spade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 I'd lead a club, as the easiest way to beat the contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSGibson Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 ♣. A spade lead is too much of a parlay - it says either partner has the spade ace and another trick, or that there is a losing 2nd round spade and no ability to pitch it on hearts. I don't see that as particularly likely - not only does our length make it more likely that North has spade shortage, but South would be far less likely to bid 6 off 2 quicks in a major, I think - at least, it would give me pause. a club has the benefit of having a clear path to defeating the contract, with the risk of maybe killing partner's 3rd round club trick. Oh well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nige1 Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 ♠ K J x x x x ♥10 9 x x ♦ x x ♣ x(4NT)-pass-(6♦)-all pass. 4NT is minors, they are favourable. IMO ♠ = 10, ♣ = 9, ♥ = 8,♦ = 2. (Upgraded ♣ lead, in the light of persuasive arguments by Gnasher, CSGibson, and Mr Ace - although I fear that it's likely to clear up the ♣ suit for declarer) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilKing Posted July 20, 2013 Report Share Posted July 20, 2013 4NT minors. Hmmm, that's unlikely to be done without 6-6 distribution, I would think, but it would be nice to know for sure. Anyway, a club looks like the best chance for two tricks. Trying to grab a major suit trick looks like a mugs game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAce Posted July 20, 2013 Report Share Posted July 20, 2013 I am with those who leads ♣ But hard to hit the right lead when the hand is posted in BBF, especially in "interesting hands" Leading your stiff vs a suit slam ? Naaa it would not make its way to here if that was the case. :P More likely we are cashing 2 fast spade tricks.(which is possible if you hit the ♠ A with your pd, 4NT opener has 2 spades and 6♦ bidder was gambling/hoping for non spade lead or expecting hispd to have it, while club lead needs pd to hold any minor ace for success. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted July 20, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2013 I am with those who leads ♣ But hard to hit the right lead when the hand is posted in BBF, especially in "interesting hands" Leading your stiff vs a suit slam ? Naaa it would not make its way to here if that was the case. :P More likely we are cashing 2 fast spade tricks.(which is possible if you hit the ♠ A with your pd, 4NT opener has 2 spades and 6♦ bidder was gambling/hoping for non spade lead or expecting hispd to have it, while club lead needs pd to hold any minor ace for success. Wrong post for your logic, here I led a spade and let it make when partner had ♦A and some useless honors in the majors (♥KQ I think). Dummy had ♦K10xxxx ♣AK10xxx. But had you posted this logic on the pitch or finesse hand you would had triumph :), pitch goes down there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAce Posted July 20, 2013 Report Share Posted July 20, 2013 Wrong post for your logic, here I led a spade and let it make when partner had ♦A and some useless honors in the majors (♥KQ I think). Dummy had ♦K10xxxx ♣AK10xxx. But had you posted this logic on the pitch or finesse hand you would had triumph :), pitch goes down there. Well.....i knew one of these days someone will post a problem where the most likely winning action is actually the winning action :P in "interesting hands" section. So that should be it :) I was wrong in my previous assumption, i owe you a beer or 2 when we meet ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.