Jump to content

Organizing system notes


Recommended Posts

I find myself playing with an increasing number of partners and having trouble keeping myself on track as to what I'm playing with each one. Does anyone have a suggestion for organizing multiple sets of system notes? And does anyone have experience with the commercial software named HCS System Notebook?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always try and create an electronic system card using the WBF system editor. I always use the Notes [] feature. It does for casual partnerships.

 

For more complex partnerships I use LateX, one directory per system as well as an electronic CC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything is in Word format right now.

 

Systemic agreements are divided into 9 categories:

 

A: General

B: Majors Suit Openings

C: Minor Suit Openings

D: 1N Openings

E: 2C and 2D Openings (Special)

F: Preempts

G: Competitive bidding

H: Slam Bidding

I: Leads and Carding

 

Within a category, the list might look like this, which are the actual .docs:

 

B1: Major suit openings and responses

B2: 2/1 Notes

B3: 1NF Notes

B4: Major Suit Raises: Gitelman, Constructive, Reverse Drury, Splinters, Fit Jumps, etc..

 

I have it in this format because although I'm not a tecchie, I hope to convert this to HTML one day and have a website for both of us to refer to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One day I will write nice system note editor/viewer program to do this (and hopefully integrate it with a whole new convention card/auto-alert facility within BBO).

 

It won't be tomorrow :)

 

Fred Gitelman

Bridge Base Inc.

www.bridgebase.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One day I will write nice system note editor/viewer program to do this (and hopefully integrate it with a whole new convention card/auto-alert facility within BBO).

 

It won't be tomorrow :)

 

Fred Gitelman

Bridge Base Inc.

www.bridgebase.com

Day after is fine too Fred :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We use Word, Excel, InfoPath, and sometimes Powerpoint to get our notes.

 

We have sections as follows:

 

A. The Beginning

 

1. 1C openers and responses (super lengthy)

2. 1C interference (reasonable)

3. 1D openers and responses

4. 1H/S openers and responses

5. 1NT openers and responses

6. 2C opener.....

7. 2D openers...

8. 2H opener.....

9. 2S and 2NT openers....

10. 3NT opener.....

 

B. The Middle

 

1. Competitive Bidding (with subsections for multicuebid, 1NT overcall for 3 suits, 2NT jump bids, Roman Jump Overcalls, so on....)

2. Doubles

3. Redoubles

4. Forcing Pass Agreements

5. Other Conventional Calls

 

C. The End

 

1. Slam Agreements (lengthy chapter)

2. Defensive Agreements (subsectioned in Obvious Shift, 1st discard, defensive priorities, so on...)

3. Defenses Against Specific Openings/Treatments (very lengthy)

4. Misc.

 

System notes should be articulated in a form understood by both players. We use linear tree approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also use word (with macro's to insert the colored card symbols very easy :ph34r: ), with following cathegories:

 

1) Opening bids overview

2) 1 opening (complete responsescheme and slambidding tools)

3) Constructive bidding (with the constructive openings)

4) Preemptive bidding (with 2-level and higher opening bids)

5) Overcalls

6) Defense (several subcathegories on specific defenses)

7) Leads & Carding

 

And next to all that I also make my convention card with the WBF CCE program.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i would suggest a wiki type software (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki).

 

it is very manageable, especially by multiple "editors" (for example, i'm writing about 1C/D and continuations and in the same time my part write about 1H/S; then we review each other work).

 

though the content is in romanian, you can have a look at http://www.hq.ro/vang/dokuwiki/coco-vang_system_notes

to get an ideea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Applications such as Word and perfectly fine as text editors, however, I think that they are woefully insufficient as a tool to organize System notes

 

I tend towards overkill, especially where technology is concerned. Here is a general description regarding the critical characteristics that I would want in a tool for organizing system notes.

 

1. The ability to represent the bidding system as a tree structure. In particular, I would want to be able to expand and contract nodes

 

2. Explicit links between the system notes and a dealer program. In an ideal world, the system notes should be able to serve as a script for a Dealer program.

 

3. Explict links between the system notes and a graphical display tool. A picture is worth a thousand worlds. In an ideal world, I'd want to be able to graph the strength of different bids. (For anyone who asks why, consider the thread on whether a 1NT opening on a 14 HCP 6322 pattern is alertable or not)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...