Jump to content

这样的描述叫牌合理吗


lycier

Recommended Posts

[hv=sns=SQHAK864DJCAK9876&w=SAT5HJTD7543CQ542&n=SJ8743HQ9DAT82CT3&e=SK962H7532DKQ96CJ&d=e&v=n&b=18&a=P1CP1SP2HP2NP3HP4CP4HP4NP6CPPP]499|350[/hv]

 

南北家是两位世界大师。

北家:levin就是Robert

南家:Stevo就是steve weinstein

 

6打不成,检视一下叫牌序列,你可同意?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

最近包括本帖总计出现3个雷同的帖子和雷同的问题:

 

花色长套是:AK9876不是乐不可支的满贯强花色!它要求同伴要有一枚顶张的支持或3-4张,最好是4张的支持!事实上这样差强人意的太早的乐观是失败的估值的典型牌例!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

我认为,南家的持牌虽然有17个大牌点,Q和J是没有价值的废点,不能计算。原始估值只有14点,不够逆叫的大牌实力。如果把Q换成Q后叫牌进程不变,这时候的6定约应该是好定约。

依牌型来看,开叫1是对的,但是,大牌实力不够逆叫呀。所以,南家的牌还是开叫1后,再作打算。

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...