Flame Posted January 4, 2005 Report Share Posted January 4, 2005 Playing on the abalucy turney today, i was on the lead against 6sp with[hv=s=sk10hq4dk72cq109873]133|100|[/hv]The bidding wasRHO - LHO1S-2NT*(showing fit)3H*(nat) 4C(cue)4NT-5S(2 key card+Q)6SThe bidding seemed abit odd to me but i had to lead anyway. What do you lead ?What do you think of a spade lead ?If The A of spade is in declarer hand, this might cost, but could just dont matter if declarer refinnese or play small and partner has the J.If dummy has the A, maybe he will play it.The clue i was betting on was the 4nt bid, if he had only one of the other suits controled he would probebly cue bid, so most likely he got both red aces which leave the spade ace to dummy.Well stupid or smart it worked just fine and 6sp went down 1.(more then 20 imps between 6sp makes and going down 1) :) http://bridgebase.lunarpages.com/cgi-bin/h...1001&tzoffset=0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted January 4, 2005 Report Share Posted January 4, 2005 That is a reasonable line of thought. It reminds me of the old classic when you are on lead against a slam with AQx of trumps. Lead the A; if the K is in dummy, declarer is likely to rise on the next S. If the K is in declarer's hand, nothing is lost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted January 4, 2005 Report Share Posted January 4, 2005 Also a famous lead against 7 after stayman sequence when you hold Qxx in trumps. Another one I Was told, Buratti played a tourney with my father, after 3♦-ps-3NT-ps-ps-ps he led ♦ from ♦Qxx wich also worked pretty well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.