lycier Posted April 6, 2013 Report Share Posted April 6, 2013 [hv=pc=n&s=s87hk975dqct97632&d=s&v=n&b=15&a=p1c1np]133|200[/hv] 基本判断：1-如何叫牌（How to bid?）2-你对这手牌如何认识的？ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madongjun Posted April 7, 2013 Report Share Posted April 7, 2013 同伴在对方开叫1C的情况下争叫1NT，这手牌与开叫时相比我判断是有所增值，如果能落脚到草花定约比无将定约会好些。叫2NT转到草花? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lycier Posted April 7, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 7, 2013 [hv=sn=lycier&s=S87HK975DQCT97632&wn=机器人&w=ST53HAJ43DAJ5CKJ4&nn=3ntmk&n=SAQJ9HQ8DK42CAQ85&en=机器人&e=SK642HT62DT98763C&d=s&v=n&b=31&a=P1C(Minor%20suit%20opening%20--%203+%20C%3B%2011-21%20HCP%3B%2012-22%20total%20points)1NP2NP3CPPP]499|350[/hv] 1-同伴1nt肯定地表达了♣有大牌止张，至少2枚♣，面对明手6张♣，我们可以非常现实地认为：我们已经发现了一门花色的8张配合，即便是♣是敌方开叫花色！2-寻找♥配合渺茫，因为明手抓到了6张♣3-定约3♣将有一定的阻击性，敌方读牌会出现障碍。4-主打♣定约，明手的♣小2小3都有机会成为赢墩，而打无将定约，天知道♣的小2小3会不会是赢墩。 综上所述，再叫2nt转移3♣，然后pass！ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lycier Posted April 7, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 7, 2013 不知道为什么，许多人也许对这些基础题不太感冒。其实你看看，这些基础题才是最重要的基本逻辑推理思维，貌似简单，切实掌握起来不容易，也不是那么轻易答出来的，能够举一反三了然于心，可也算了不起，我以为这些才是让人受益的实惠，虽然一般人不屑一顾。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
00master Posted April 7, 2013 Report Share Posted April 7, 2013 争叫1NT之后续与开叫基本一致~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wuhuan Posted April 9, 2013 Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 学习了！ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.