Jump to content

CALL TO ARMS 4/27 SATURDAY


gszes

Recommended Posts

if you receive no reply from mars are you willing to patner another random poster?

 

I'd rather play in a known partnership, especially since it's canape club. They haven't dealt with that often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather play in a known partnership, especially since it's canape club. They haven't dealt with that often.

 

for what its worth the only time we beat them (the last match 6 weeks ago i think the score was 34-30)

everyone on the tem was playing a 2/1 variant. There is no need for too many special effects (ok ok i admit

we talk about a LOT of special effects) we want to see good solid bridge like the kind we write about here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading the notes it looks possible we have possibly maybe 7 players interested with

2 set pairs. here is my understanding of the recap.

Jillybean TylerE Nige1 Gszeszycki individuals wishing to partner anyone

PhilKing and Cameron Small (is that bbo name)

Jallerton and frances (is that bbo name) are willing to play if they can partner Phil and Cameron

 

I'll be honest it will be a last resort to play a pair that want to limit who the other two players will be

so if i misread that statement about Jallerton and partner let me know. I will let JEC know in about

6 hours who we are starting and i think we will even have extras so maybe a pair can start and

we can sub in a pair after 14 boards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jallerton and frances (is that bbo name) are willing to play if they can partner Phil and Cameron

 

I'll be honest it will be a last resort to play a pair that want to limit who the other two players will be so if i misread that statement about Jallerton and partner let me know.

 

jallerton can speak for theirself but it seemed to me that the offer was simply to fill out the team with a regular partnership of two BBF posters, rather than one poster + one not OR two posters who hadn't played together, and assuming that Phil and Cameron were already committed to.

 

IMHO the forums give the best account of themselves with regular partnerships, but the pickup approach appears to work fine too, so whatevs. :) I'm just glad we have these matches at all. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jallerton can speak for theirself but it seemed to me that the offer was simply to fill out the team with a regular partnership of two BBF posters, rather than one poster + one not OR two posters who hadn't played together, and assuming that Phil and Cameron were already committed to.

 

Correct. You seemed to be concerned about not having regular partnerships of BBF posters.

 

"frances (is that a bbo name?)" is Finch on BBO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that, in general, we should be aiming to field the strongest team possible.

 

A good goal BUT

 

We had a 0-33 record and most of the matches were not close we finally won one 6 weeks ago

and haven't been able to field a team since. So tell me what criteria do we use to pick our

champions??? Should a player play again until they have lost? Do we want to have a vote

listing all of the available players and should it be open for all to see ?? Should we go strictly by

number of posts? Should we go by most MP (in which case we all have to keep our number up to date)

Should a player that has never had a chance go before one that has tried and lost before???

Do we have all players send in a resume and see which looks the most impressive? The list of ideas

is almost endless IMO we will try to field the strongest team possible but using the following "system"

 

gather players from writers (posters who answer questions)

gather players from questioners

writers with their partners

questioners with their partners

writers and questioners can form an entire team of non posters but the above will have priority.

 

Now I freely admit I do not know all of the writers (for ex I never saw a post by keylime before last week)

so I do not know all of the writers. I can go to the forums to look when they show interest in playing.

 

We should also have a seniority type set up in the sense of if you play and lose you go to the back of

the line. Playing and winning (a rare event so far) allows you to keep your current place and indeed

you should be allowed to defend your title at least every other session. That way if we do get a

ummm errr stammer yeah right winning streak one foursome cant play all the time just half the time.

 

I have no problem with 1 or 2 players going on and on and on as long as they play and win with different

partners.

 

So what does all of the above have to do with this week??? Well if the list is the way i noted it earlier

we would have a team of Jillybean TylerE Nige1 and myself (all writers) Now the next question

does anyone want to defend their recent victory (i do) If there are no others then we go by who has

never played

 

TylerE Nige1 have never played partnership philKing and cameron small have never played (as far as i can tell)

 

 

 

RIGHT THERE we have enough to form a team I will sit this one out and try next time and intend to submit

 

PhilKing and (cameron small) need bbo name and TylerE and Nige1 can partner one another I will let JEC know

 

about you four and we can straighten out bbo names tomorrow remember game is at 2pm est. jec will invite you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct. You seemed to be concerned about not having regular partnerships of BBF posters.

 

I assume that's the royal "you" and not directed at me specifically since I hadn't weighed in on that particular question before then. :) As it happens that's my preference too, but I'm mostly a bystander here so my opinion shouldn't matter so much. :)

 

EDIT: Didn't see gszes' last post till now. Agree with everything in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be honest it will be a last resort to play a pair that want to limit who the other two players will be

so if i misread that statement about Jallerton and partner let me know.

 

GreenMan is correct. In previous posts you seemed to have been complaining about the lack of volunteers and lack of available regular partnerships.

 

Presumably it will also be a last resort for you to select JLOGIC given that he has a 0/1 record in BBF vs JEC and places restrictions on his preferred opponents. That is a shame.

 

Anyway, good luck to the selected team. I hope TylerE and Nige1 have time to agree their system!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still time for a team of 6? We should be available for some practice with with TylerE and Nigel Guthrie beforehand.
IMO jallerton and franceshinden must play if available. PhilKing, Cameron1 and TylerE are worthy representatives. Although I'm happy to make up the team if needed. When is the match?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...