Jump to content

Monaco vs Auken

mrdct

By mrdct
in Appeals and Appeals Committees

 Share

Recommended Posts

bluejak

bluejak

Posted
Posted
But Jonathan retired from the BoD 5 years ago now, and that does change things. It may not and maybe should not invalidate your point, of course.

Did he? Well he keeps bouncing up to me and showing yards of teeth and sending me reports of this that and the other! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

jallerton
jallerton

Interesting. Weighted scores are not permitted in the ABCL.   I don't consider it "likely" that South would have defended differently given the alternative explanation, but maybe it was "at all probab

gnasher
gnasher

I think it's bad for the game that someone who should know better uses emotive phrases like "one of the worst decisions ever made" and presents appeals to authority (anonymous authority, in fact) inst

cherdano
cherdano

Isn't this thread pretty pointless? We neither know EW's agreement, nor do we know what NS had been told. If NS had been told that 3N denies 4S, whereas in fact it doesn't, then I suppose NS have a ca

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...