Jump to content

St Louis Appeal No 2

gnasher

By gnasher
in Laws and Rulings

 Share

Recommended Posts

mycroft

mycroft

Posted
Posted
Sure, but lamford should have said "an East Coast state" or "a State with an Atlantic coast".
Heh, I meant (which is why it was spoilered) my original comment about not trusting my judgement upon a particular agreement, not this thread's original comment. Ah well, I guess if it applies, it applies.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

cherdano
cherdano

I don't get it. Without the UI, it would be normal to bid 3D to play in our 5-4 fit rather than our 4-3 fit. With the UI, 3D is probably a game try, and may lead to partner bidding 4S - the best I can

Vampyr
Vampyr

This is an example of a law that does not say what it means. A person who has got the methods wrong must continue to get the methods wrong, and his LAs must be based on what he thought the auction, to

RSliwinski
RSliwinski

Aha, this would simplify the rullings - everytime there is a question of MI or missbid, the potential missbider will always claim that his partner was right and that he missbid. No need to check anyth

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...