barmar Posted March 26, 2013 Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 Yes. It's called "The Acol Bridge Club", if I remember correctly. However, the name of neither the one in Acol Street nor the one on BBO is "Acol", the name of both is "The Acol Bridge Club".Wow, that's getting really finicky. By that logic, there are no states in the US named Massachusetts, Rhode Island, or Virginia. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackshoe Posted March 26, 2013 Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 Technically, Massachussets and Virginia are "Commonwealths". However, there's a difference between the two situations. One of the definitions of "commonwealth" is "a formal title of some of the states of the US". Rhode Island is "The State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations" which is unique and the longest name of any of the states, but all fifty of the fifty states are states. "Acol" is the name of a street in London and the name of a bidding system. It is not the name of a bridge club, although I wouldn't be surprised if the one in Acol Street is referred to informally as "the Acol". The one on BBO is likely referred to informally as "BBO". But you're right, this is far afield, and we've probably exhausted any useful discussion about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted March 26, 2013 Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 we've probably exhausted any useful discussion about it.Not quite. Is it OK if I nitpick your nitpick? It is not the name of a bridge club, although I wouldn't be surprised if the one in Acol Street is referred to informally as "the Acol"There is no street called "Acol Street" - it's Acol Road, as mentioned in the three posts that immediately preceded yours. And the Acol Bridge Club is now in West End Lane. But it is commonly referred to as "The Acol". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WellSpyder Posted March 26, 2013 Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 we've probably exhausted any useful discussion about it.Not quite [....] Depends on your definition of "useful"! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billw55 Posted March 26, 2013 Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 I nominate this thread for hijack of the year. lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jandrew Posted March 26, 2013 Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 I nominate this thread for hijack of the year. lol Perhaps you are right. I was the TD at the tournament at which the OP played, and was aware of his alert and of his opp's enquiry thereon. I wanted to join in the thread without getting into the argument. The diversion which I joined, however, is now more appropriately described as a hijack. I shall, therefore, be content if no hostages are taken :rolleyes: . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackshoe Posted March 26, 2013 Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 Not quite. Is it OK if I nitpick your nitpick? There is no street called "Acol Street" - it's Acol Road, as mentioned in the three posts that immediately preceded yours. And the Acol Bridge Club is now in West End Lane. But it is commonly referred to as "The Acol".What's the difference between a street and a road? But I suppose you can nitpick that if you like. B-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluejak Posted April 18, 2013 Report Share Posted April 18, 2013 No idea about BBO, EBU we don't technically have to tell people our weak 2s could be a 4 card suit and a yarborough in some positions as they are natural and weak but we do.That's about to change. But certainly five card suits are not alertable. That is the point, exactly. If we have an agreement (implicit or explicit) to vary from the norm, then we disclose. Otherwise, what we actually made the bid with is not alertable. When we are self alerting, we alert what partner should have alerted IRL without screens.Ooh, I don't think so. As with screens, you alert rather more, because there are no UI problems. Furthermore, you can put the explanation in straight away, can you not, without waiting to be asked? :ph34r: It is a pity that people decide to mis-spell for no obvious reason. I suppose they are so used to SAYC and so on. But while the Acol system was named after the club which was named after the road, it is less clear that the road was named after the village in Kent, or that it has any connection. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted April 18, 2013 Report Share Posted April 18, 2013 What's the difference between a street and a road? But I suppose you can nitpick that if you like. I've only just noticed this. A street is usually in a town, and its primary function tends to be to provide access to the buildings on either side; a road's primary function tends to be to provide a route from one place to another. There are many exceptions to this rule, including Watling Street (an ancient Roman road) and Acol Road (a street in North London). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mycroft Posted April 18, 2013 Report Share Posted April 18, 2013 I am now reminded of Former Ontario Highway 11a, otherwise known as Avenue Road. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackshoe Posted April 19, 2013 Report Share Posted April 19, 2013 I've only just noticed this. A street is usually in a town, and its primary function tends to be to provide access to the buildings on either side; a road's primary function tends to be to provide a route from one place to another. There are many exceptions to this rule, including Watling Street (an ancient Roman road) and Acol Road (a street in North London).Thanks, Andy. I had just looked them both up and then saw your post. Good to know. Interesting aside: one of the things I stumbled over in David Weber's fantasy series about Bahzell Bahnakson, a Paladin of the war god Tomanak, was that every place where we would say "anyway", the characters say "any road". Took me a while to get it. :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackshoe Posted April 19, 2013 Report Share Posted April 19, 2013 Ooh, I don't think so. As with screens, you alert rather more, because there are no UI problems.Is this one of those "custom and practice" things? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluejak Posted April 19, 2013 Report Share Posted April 19, 2013 With screens, no: you are told to be more forthcoming. Online I suppose I am being optimistic because of all the people whose idea of fairness is limited or whose ignorance is great. But people who understand tend to alert more because they know the downside is less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mycroft Posted April 19, 2013 Report Share Posted April 19, 2013 I would add that there is an incentive to self-Alert and auto-explain playing online: 1NT-2♣!;2♦!-2NT!3♣!-3♦!3NT ...and now comes the ask about what 3♣ means. "No 5cM, not any 4333". Club lead from Txx sets the contract, of course. No, I have no idea which opponent asked.</sarcasm> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.