lexlogan Posted February 19, 2013 Report Share Posted February 19, 2013 I had a strong hand recently opposite partner's Jordan 2NT: 1♥-(dbl)-2NT . I just settled for game, but realized I had no clear way to explore for slam. With some partners I've agreed a new suit shows a singleton (ala Jacoby), but as 3♥ would not be forcing, it's harder to show a strong hand with no singleton. I suppose 3NT could be 16+. bridgehands has a 3♣ gadget rebid. Anyone have experience or a (preferably simple) scheme? Jordan itself is rare enough and I can't recall another case where I had slam interest. For discussion, I had something like xx AQxxx Ax AQxx; the Jordan bid promised limit+ values and four card support. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barmar Posted February 19, 2013 Report Share Posted February 19, 2013 Jordan itself is rare enough and I can't recall another case where I had slam interest.Which is probably why there aren't well-known continuations. With LHO having opening bid strength, it's pretty rare to be able to make slam. Especially if the bigger hand is opener's -- any finesse are likely to be losing to the doubler. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awm Posted February 19, 2013 Report Share Posted February 19, 2013 I've always thought it was standard to play: 3M = minimum4M = max but not very slam interested3NT = balanced with extrasElse = same as over Jacoby (so 3x = singleton) I play this in partnerships other than those where we play 2NT as a limit+ raise outside of competition (in which case we just play our normal followups). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted February 19, 2013 Report Share Posted February 19, 2013 IMO, 3NT as balanced with extras would mean a whole lot of extras...interested in slam only if my Jordan guy was on the + of L.R.+. In a strong NT context, that would be the only balanced with extras possible; but in any methods, it seems best from a leakage standpoint to just accept or not accept, unless slamming. Also, Jordan after 1MX should itself be balanced, and the unbalanced L.R. can mini splinter 2S(or 3m)/1HX or 3 any/1SX. The leakage is about the hand which will be dummy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zelandakh Posted February 19, 2013 Report Share Posted February 19, 2013 Is Standard not that Opener bids 3♣ with a strong hand and then Responder describes further? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted February 19, 2013 Report Share Posted February 19, 2013 What we do: 3 of a suit below ours long suit game or slam try, usually 4+ cards3M minimum3 of a suit above ours, slam try, natural3N balanced and big (in a 4M context where we open the minor with 4M4m, so 44 majors or 3433)4 of a suit below ours, splinter, slam try4M usually a little above minimum with 6 card suit Also, Jordan after 1MX should itself be balanced, and the unbalanced L.R. can mini splinter 2S(or 3m)/1HX or 3 any/1SX. The leakage is about the hand which will be dummy. We play fit jumps rather than splinters to give an idea of source of tricks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.