xeno123 Posted February 8, 2013 Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 Couple of recent hands I played: Supporting my second suit is not "Fourth Suit forcing" as the description claims: http://tinyurl.com/ad8q7nk On a more substantive note, why no support for my 2♠ overcall of a 2♥ pre-emptive opening when my bot partner has 4 spades and close to an opening hand in support of spades: http://tinyurl.com/bbqlp2b This was a replay of a Cavendish deal, and in the bot's position Zia as North bid 4♠ over a 3♦ intervention by West after the same two initial bids, while Bathurst in the same scenario chimed in with 4♦ (presumably constructive spade support) converted to 4♠ by South. I suppose one might argue that the diamond bid improved North's hand some, but surely the North hand over a pass by West is worth at least 3♠? My overcall is described as 12-18 points, so North should know game is at very least possible. (I'm assuming the bot doesn't know enough to discount his AK♥ some because of the opening bid). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephen Tu Posted February 9, 2013 Report Share Posted February 9, 2013 The so-called "fourth suit forcing" 1m-1h-1s-2s was previously reported and supposedly fixed next version. Hopefully they also fixed the definition of your 3s continuation which should have a more specific point range. Agree 2nd hand is bizarre. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.