jillybean Posted February 8, 2013 Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 ♠J94♥K7♦K7♣AKJ532 First seat, NV vs. V, MP your bid and why? :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrothgar Posted February 8, 2013 Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 1NT 1. Provides an accurate description of values and shape2. Protect's my Kings on the opening lead 3. No rebid problems in constructive auctions4. I can balance in 3♣ if the opponents land in a major Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billw55 Posted February 8, 2013 Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 I'll open 1NT, because: 1. avoids in-between rebid decision (2♣ or 3♣?)2. at matchpoints, I am not so keen to play in clubs anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bd71 Posted February 8, 2013 Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 I'll open 1NT, because: 1. avoids in-between rebid decision (2♣ or 3♣?)2. at matchpoints, I am not so keen to play in clubs anyway Agree with 1N and the reasons from hrothgar and bill, but there's also a corrolary to #2 here...which is that at teams I likely open 1C and plan to rebid 3C over most responses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArtK78 Posted February 8, 2013 Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 Looks like a 1NT opener. I could say that the reason is that it is matchpoints, and that would not be inaccurate. But I would probably open 1NT at IMPs as well, as it is a reasonably good description of the hand. The disadvantage to opening 1NT at IMPs is that it is going to make it difficult, if not impossible, to reach a club contract (partscore, game or slam) when it is right. That is not as much of a consideration at matchpoints, where notrump rules the roost and minor suit contacts are for children. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted February 8, 2013 Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 1NT 1. Provides an accurate description of values and shape2. Protect's my Kings on the opening lead 3. No rebid problems in constructive auctions4. I can balance in 3♣ if the opponents land in a majorAND ---I want to take the 1-level away from the enemy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted February 8, 2013 Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 1N. I am gravitating away from offshape NT openings, but this hand seems hard to describe after 1♣. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted February 8, 2013 Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 Looks like a 1NT opener. I could say that the reason is that it is matchpoints, and that would not be inaccurate. But I would probably open 1NT at IMPs as well, as it is a reasonably good description of the hand. The disadvantage to opening 1NT at IMPs is that it is going to make it difficult, if not impossible, to reach a club contract (partscore, game or slam) when it is right. That is not as much of a consideration at matchpoints, where notrump rules the roost and minor suit contacts are for children.Actually, at IMPs there is (IMO) even one more reason to open 1NT. But, this is a MP thread; so I will back off the tangent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted February 8, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 1N. I am gravitating away from offshape NT openings (snip)Why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted February 8, 2013 Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 1♣ because I play 12-14, I would however rebid 1N. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neilkaz Posted February 8, 2013 Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 In bridge we try to cater to what is most likely to happen. We also love to make things harder for the opps. A wonderful auction is 1NT-3NT not giving very much info to the defense. I'm happy to open 1NT here for many reasons and think that the plusses clearly outway the minuses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted February 8, 2013 Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 Why? Something of an experiment I suppose. In addition, I have a partner that is not fond of them, and I am trying to adapt to this style. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSGibson Posted February 8, 2013 Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 I probably open 1♣ planning on rebidding 3♣ because the club suit is so good. I don't object to opening 1N, and certainly think that if NT is played, it should be played from my side. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdeegan Posted February 8, 2013 Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 :P Right on the borderline between 1♣ and 1NT. It really depends on partner (weaker favors 1NT), state of the match (hard to get to makable 6♣ after 1NT opener), and our system (easier to rebid 3♣ playing SAYC). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted February 8, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 Something of an experiment I suppose. In addition, I have a partner that is not fond of them, and I am trying to adapt to this style.Maybe you are playing with my partner? Luckily my partner accepts my opening style although he still wouldn't do it - yet. This hand was unfortunate, I managed to wrong side the conract. [hv=pc=n&s=sj94hk7dk7cakj532&w=sak85ht4dj953c876&n=st73haqj8653da2c4&e=sq62h92dqt864cqt9&d=s&v=e&b=3&a=1np2dp2hp4hppp]399|300[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FM75 Posted February 8, 2013 Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 2♣ (Precision)11-15 with 5 strong clubs and a 4 card major, or reasonably strong 6 card club suit. It might get passed out, or who knows. Just have to see what partner comes up with. The most likely continuation:2♣ - 2♦ relay, asking for a 4 card major2N - 3♦ 6 clubs, 2 outside suits stopped (no 4 card major) - which one is not stopped?3♠ - 4♥ no spade stop, 3N is unattractive after that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted February 8, 2013 Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 Maybe you are playing with my partner? Luckily my partner accepts my opening style although he still wouldn't do it - yet. This hand was unfortunate, I managed to wrong side the conract. You didn't really wrongside it, it was equally likely that the other hand had the spades and you got a top, you just played it the other way up to everybody else, sometimes you get unlucky. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts