xx1943 Posted January 27, 2013 Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 [hv=pc=n&n=s2hakt652dqjtcak7&d=n&v=0&b=1&a=1hp2dp2hp2s(gf; not balanced)p3dp3h(doubleton !H)p4n(RKCB 1403)p5s(2 keys and !SQ)p5n(Specify your Kings)p6d(!DK, no !CK, may have !SK)p]133|200|Scoring method: IMPs[/hv]We play 2/1; flannery, Bergen raises, forcing 1NT after major opening.2♠ = 100% game forcing and denies a balanced hand (4333 or 4432 or 5332)3♥ = exactly doubleton ♥. With 3 cards in partners suit we raise generally in the 2nd round4NT = RKCB 14035♠ = 2 keys and ♥Q5NT = Have all keys. Asking for specific Kings.6♦ = Have ♦K, have not ♣K and may have ♠K Now what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TWO4BRIDGE Posted January 27, 2013 Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 First of all... a well written post . It looks like all you need is a 3-2 ♥ split for the grand... a 68% shot . [ Your ♣ loser will go on the 4th high ♦. ] 7H since it IMPs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xx1943 Posted January 27, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 First of all... a well written post . It looks like all you need is a 3-2 ♥ split for the grand... a 68% shot . [ Your ♣ loser will go on the 4th high ♦. ] 7H since it IMPs In 7♥ you need hearts 3==2 or the singleton J; perhaps even a trump coup maybe possible. BUT 7♦ has more than 96%.(I'll show both hands in another post) And playing IMPs (Yes IMP not MP) the difference in score for 7♥ and 7♦ doesn't matter really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TWO4BRIDGE Posted January 27, 2013 Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 You are right. I overlooked the "unbalanced" Responder hand which has at least 5 cards ♦ , sooooo, you can handle 4-1 splits in both red suits.... thus, a 96+ % chance in 7D . Even if Responder has a stiff ♣ and the opening lead knocks out that entry ( to your ♥ if they don't split ) , you should still have an easy 13 tricks. Responder would have 6 cards ♦ ( 4 2 6 1 hand ) and the 13th trick would be an early ♠-ruff : 1s, 3h, 6d, 2c, and the ruff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manudude03 Posted January 27, 2013 Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 Partner is known to have at least Axxx Qx AKxxx xx. If you're going to bid 7H, you may as well bid 7N. Both contracts just require hearts to come in. How strong are the opponents? If they're weak, I'll settle for 7D. If they're strong, we should probably risk 7N. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve2005 Posted January 27, 2013 Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 if its 68% for 7♥/7N and 96% for 7♦then at imps its no contest i pick 7♦ since this is a novice beginner forum, i would assume at mp field isn't bidding grand, so would still bid safer 7♦ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xx1943 Posted January 27, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 if its 68% for 7♥/7N and 96% for 7♦then at imps its no contest i pick 7♦ since this is a novice beginner forum, i would assume at mp field isn't bidding grand, so would still bid safer 7♦Agree 100%Al Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgoetze Posted January 27, 2013 Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 73.5% (3-2 break or J singleton) is an absolute lower bound on the success chance for 7NT. There are a number of things partner could have to raise that number even higher, such as the ♥J, extra diamond length, ♣Q, and so on. OK, in a field where anyone bidding and making a grand is the story of the month, sure, bid 7♦. But in a decent field, I think this is a close call. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilKing Posted January 28, 2013 Report Share Posted January 28, 2013 IMPs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts