lycier Posted January 27, 2013 Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 [hv=pc=n&s=saq65hkq4dak96c75&d=n&v=0&b=1&a=1dp1sp2dp]133|200[/hv] 南家,持强牌如何显示对同伴低花的支持?这是一个极重要的叫牌进程 ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3ntmk Posted January 27, 2013 Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 先应叫了1M后如何显示对同伴低花支持,我不太清楚。但这个进程可以跳到4D表示强的支持,同时也是低花木。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lycier Posted January 27, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 27, 2013 这个进程很难,我在等待大家伙的讨论,然后在具体谈谈,而且都带有约定性的。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wuhuan Posted January 28, 2013 Report Share Posted January 28, 2013 同意3NTMK老师观点————跳叫4D低花木 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
601821297 Posted January 28, 2013 Report Share Posted January 28, 2013 我认为无将老师的说法是对的 :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lycier Posted January 28, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2013 Looking at my file notes, I found this same problem from a different Message board about 8 years ago. It was suggested for the Diam case :1D - 1S2D - 3D = GF with only 4 cards ♠ and concern about ♣ .Note that Responder can't have 4 cards ♥ either because with 4-4 he would have bid 1H first .- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Likewise for:1D - 1H2D - 3D = GF with only 4 cards ♥ and concern about ♣ .If Responder also had 4 cards ♠, he would have reversed into 2S . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The Club case doesn't have a rebid "space" problem :1C - 1M2C - 2D! ( cheapest bid new suit forcing analogous to NMF over a 1NT rebid )BBO论坛太好了,这也是我一直的心病,看到世界各国的高手们的意见,让人大看眼界,感觉自己真的很初级,知道的看到的总是那么一点点皮毛而已.....关于此类话题,我总结出三类主流意见: 第一是TWO4BRIDGE意见:1-关于♦再叫的建议: 1D - 1S2D - 3D = 逼局,只有4张♠,对♣ 担忧。注意:应叫人不可能有4张♥,因为果如4-4高花,那应叫人应叫的是1♥首先。 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2-同理可证: 1D - 1H2D - 3D = 逼局,只有4张♥,对♣ 担忧。如果应叫人也有4张♠,他会逆叫2♠ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3-关于♣的序列,就不存在再叫的空间问题。 1C - 1M2C - 2D! (2♦ 是最便宜的新花逼叫,类似于再叫1nt后,应叫人的新低花逼叫。 ) 第二是lowerline的意见: This is what I play: 1♦ - 1♠ 2♦ - 2♥ (inv+ relay) Then:2♠ = 4crd ♥ (2nt or 3♦ next can be passed)2nt = 6♦ max GF3♣ = 6♦4♣ (3♦ next can be passed)3♦ = 6♦ min NF3♥ = 4♥6♦ GF3♠ = 3♠6♦ GF The issue with the invitational major 2suiter remains of course. But you have already given the solution for those. Steven 这是我的叫牌方式: 1♦ - 1♠ 2♦ - 2♥ (邀请+接力) 那么:2♠ = 4张 ♥ (应叫人再叫2nt or 3♦ 不逼叫,可以pass。)2nt = 6♦ 高限,逼局 。3♣ = 6♦+4♣ (应叫人再叫3♦ 不逼叫,可以pass。)3♦ = 6♦ 低限,不逼叫。3♥ = 4♥6♦ 逼局。3♠ = 3♠6♦ 逼局。 第三是以fluffy,phil和3ntmk为代表的意见:2♥ is the standard solution. 4♦ is also possible. A few non-standard: 1. Include 4cM's in your inverted minors. 2. Play 3♦ here as a one round force. 3. Start with a Rexfordesque 2!c. I would always take 4♦ as a slam try. I would bid 2♥ and then 3♦ as a forcing raise, specially playing MPs, 世界大师fluffy意见:我会永远把4♦ 作为满贯试探。而我先叫2♥,然后再叫3♦ 作为逼局性加叫。先应叫了1M后如何显示对同伴低花支持,我不太清楚。但这个进程可以跳到4D表示强的支持,同时也是低花木。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nathan2008 Posted January 28, 2013 Report Share Posted January 28, 2013 用流行的 加叫低花逼叫得话,为什么不先2D? S 有44 总归有办法叫出来的。只有先2d 才有可能更容易上 6D。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lycier Posted January 28, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2013 I don't know if it is standard but it is certainly an option . 2H! = cheapest new bid suit forcing ( replies analogous to NMF over 1NT rebid ) and may be artificial.But what if Opener has 4 cards ♥ and you don't ( as here ) ? 1D - 2S2D - 2H!3H - ?? now what ?? 而phil和fluffy的意见,遭到了TWO4BRIDGE强大的反戈一击: 如果这是标准方案,我不知晓,但我认为这不过是一个选择而已。假设说,果如你所言:2H! = 最便宜的新花逼叫叫品,也许是个约定叫。但是!当开叫人有4张♥,而你并没有,看看下面序列吧: 1D - 2S2D - 2H!3H - ?? 请问您现在如何处理? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madongjun Posted January 28, 2013 Report Share Posted January 28, 2013 嗯,这个如何处理后面是加了两个??的。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lycier Posted January 28, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2013 是的,加叫同伴最便宜的高花,永远都是四张加叫的。这是叫牌法则。所以,遭到了强烈的反击。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zyp163 Posted January 28, 2013 Report Share Posted January 28, 2013 如果没有人为设计叫品,我认为:基于5542体系。1D-1H/1S2D-3D这个3D是逼叫性,承诺到4D水平的。原因:1.开叫人叫2D未否认有另一高花四张。他只是因牌力低限不能叫而已。2.1H/1S应叫是高花优先,开叫人2D表示低限了,在无成局希望的情况下,何必自加一级定约? 基于以上观点:1D-1H/1S2D-4D这个4D正如3NTMK老师所讲,是有满贯意愿的,即使定义为关键张问叫也合理。 5542框架下的1C我没想好。我宁愿把1C开叫当成0NT开叫。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lycier Posted January 29, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2013 如果没有人为设计叫品,我认为:基于5542体系。1D-1H/1S2D-3D这个3D是逼叫性,承诺到4D水平的。原因:1.开叫人叫2D未否认有另一高花四张。他只是因牌力低限不能叫而已。2.1H/1S应叫是高花优先,开叫人2D表示低限了,在无成局希望的情况下,何必自加一级定约? 基于以上观点:1D-1H/1S2D-4D这个4D正如3NTMK老师所讲,是有满贯意愿的,即使定义为关键张问叫也合理。 5542框架下的1C我没想好。我宁愿把1C开叫当成0NT开叫。你对3♦的自愿加叫,理由不是充分。这里面争议很大的。我还可以说你的自愿3♦是不逼叫的邀请呢。也不是没有专家认为:自愿加叫3d做逼局,是不标准的,phil就是这个意见。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yunling Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 第一轮就叫2C(C套或者均型逼局)吧。把这种牌往本来就拥挤不堪的1D-1M序列里塞实在是勉为其难。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hejiang Posted April 1, 2013 Report Share Posted April 1, 2013 低花配合,但又不符合低花加叫(有四张高花)的强牌,如何合理既做到逼叫又显示配合确实有点难,止于3NT吧又不甘心,想探冠吧也许只有3NT是最佳定约。想起独孤狐曾经教过的高拉蒂,处理这类问题确实有独到之处。1♦--2♣(首先建立一个进局显示,不否定四张高花,留下空间进一步描述)3♣--3♦(3♣是降级显示有5张以上♦,3♦显示配合)后续处理起来就相对比较简单,好处在于:1、首先不担心丢局2、在3阶上已知高花不配,低花配合3、为后续叫牌留下空间 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
00master Posted April 1, 2013 Report Share Posted April 1, 2013 这牌叫4♦作为罗马关键张问叫后,同伴答叫4♥表示1个关键张时,你是赌6♦还是停在5♦?这总是猜断。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dillon561 Posted April 1, 2013 Report Share Posted April 1, 2013 你对3♦的自愿加叫,理由不是充分。这里面争议很大的。我还可以说你的自愿3♦是不逼叫的邀请呢。也不是没有专家认为:自愿加叫3d做逼局,是不标准的,phil就是这个意见。是的,我也认为,不是邀请,就单是阻击都可能.如果你们没进局力量,但如果你D有配合的话,停在2D,下家很可能就会发现问题进行平衡争叫,根据总赢墩定律,你如果有3+D,联手9+张D了,最好叫上3阶封住下家口,让他冒3阶叫牌的风险.所以3D也可以就是个阻击叫品.这在很多精确牌手比赛时可看出,他们就是知道没局了就想尽可能低停在1,2阶,结果引出别人争到一个不成局定约. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wuhuan Posted April 1, 2013 Report Share Posted April 1, 2013 不论制定出什么样的约定,这副牌的软肋在C套上,论坛里的高人现在越拉越多,恳请定出一套在开叫1D后开叫、应叫方均能显示出C上有控制的约定最好。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yzdhy668 Posted April 1, 2013 Report Share Posted April 1, 2013 赞同3NT老师的4D低花木叫品。按照哈代2/1体系应叫再叫3D是邀请牌力,新花是逼叫但再叫2H描述不准确,用3C逼叫我认为更合适。 1D - 1S2D - 3C 用新低花作为逼局。3X - 4D 再用4D作为低花木问关键张 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yzdhy668 Posted April 2, 2013 Report Share Posted April 2, 2013 看到一个资料对开叫人2D再叫后的应叫是这样描述的1D - 1S2D - ?① 2H :S/H5-4以上,通常低限。② 2S :S较好5张以上,通常低限。③ 2N :9+~11-HCP,邀叫,其它花色有止。④ 3C :12+HCP,S通常5张以上,至少逼局。(新低花逼叫)⑤ 3D :9+~11-HCP,S4张以上,D3张以上,不合适再叫2N。⑥ 3H :12+HCP,S/H5-5以上。⑦ 3S :9+~11-HCP,S6张以上好套。⑧ 3N :自然。⑨ 4D :D为将的关键张问叫。⑩ 4H:D为将的排除性关键张问叫。⑾ 4S :自然止叫。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
670922 Posted April 2, 2013 Report Share Posted April 2, 2013 是不是先逼叫,新高花。后在叫出支持。再问关键张,? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fppt Posted April 5, 2013 Report Share Posted April 5, 2013 应叫人的牌,在开叫人的1♦开叫后,几乎已经看到小满贯。是否可以先以2♦反加逼叫到局展开后续叫牌。虽然说2♦似乎是隐藏了4个♠,但是在逼叫到局的基础上,如果有高花4-4配合,仍然不难找到。况且,如果是满贯的话,高低花差别不是很大的。从题中给出的开叫人第二声叫2♦看,开叫人应当是6个♦,在2♦后,继续3♦可能较大,后续通过扣叫,先明确♣的控制,再由开叫人主动查询应叫人的控制,叫局或贯,由开叫人查询后确定。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k3q2 Posted April 6, 2013 Report Share Posted April 6, 2013 带着对“反低花加叫,不能像先应叫2阶低花,然后逆叫高花,显示低花比高花(4+)长”的问题思考。以下是我的解题思路及回答:5542,c两张以上。狭义的2/1应叫共有6种,如1s:2h h5以上,1h:2d d4以上。2/1应叫的花色越低趋向于越短。沃尔什是持弱牌越过相对较长的低花应叫4+高花,本例能否越过高花先应叫低花呢?桥牌就这样:充满辩证、逻辑、相对及对立统一!你打套短大牌弥补吗?因而,我从2c(提示:两张以上)起步,延迟支持d。谢谢心烛提出如此重要的问题! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.