lycier Posted January 20, 2013 Report Share Posted January 20, 2013 [hv=pc=n&s=s9542hat84dk5ca75&n=sakj6hq9daqj8cq63&d=w&v=0&b=8&a=p1dp1hp1sp4s]266|200[/hv] 1-再叫1♠是否适切？理由是什么？2-你喜爱直接4♠吗？为什么？3-自行设计叫牌方案。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lipeng2076 Posted January 20, 2013 Report Share Posted January 20, 2013 1,不好。不如2nt。均型旁花止张良好，好庄位，大牌点也适合跳2nt强限制性，后续同伴会体贴的让您描述高花的，因此无需1s，同伴还会认为是非均牌。2，我也是跳4s进局，4张将牌支持，边花好控制，相当于3个A。3，1D 1H 2nt 3d 3s 4nt 5d 6s （1430回答3个关键张） Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lycier Posted January 20, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 20, 2013 可否说的更细致一些，比如再叫1♠的含义。直接4s的坏处。叫牌进程可否再细致一些，避免想当然。我认为这才得了80分。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sungh Posted January 20, 2013 Report Share Posted January 20, 2013 [hv=pc=n&s=s9542hat84dk5ca75&n=sakj6hq9daqj8cq63&d=w&v=0&b=8&a=p1dp1hp1sp4s]266|200[/hv] 1-再叫1♠是否适切？理由是什么？2-你喜爱直接4♠吗？为什么？3-自行设计叫牌方案。1.我认为再叫1♠不适切。我以为，开叫人的目的是将持牌情况告诉同伴，如何选择合适的叫品，显示牌型和牌力。开叫人持一手均型牌，首先要把牌型显示出来。再叫2NT也没有否认4张♠啊，所以叫2NT一下把牌型和牌力显示清楚了。再叫1♠表明一手非均型的牌，牌力范围较宽。2.3.我先思考一下。看看大家的意见。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lipeng2076 Posted January 21, 2013 Report Share Posted January 21, 2013 1D-1H-1S,应叫人已经看到局了，4s速达到局违背了好牌慢叫的原则。开叫人否定非低限均型牌，如果开叫人持单张无废点有满。因此这时可以用2d垃圾以下，先听一下开叫人的描述后，可轻松加叫开叫人的s来定将牌，后续再展开扣叫等手段推进满贯进程。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lycier Posted January 21, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2013 木子，这是我在专家级论坛上所作的结束性评论内容，你愿意给翻译成中文吗？并且顺便比较一下你我所用的进程的细微之处。 Beg your pardon,I think this problem is very easy and not suitable for Expert-Class Bridge. 1-I never agree with 1♠,it was underbid,Rebid 1♠ showed a unbalanced hand and denied low limited hand with balance if play walsh style.2nt can show a strong limited hand,and describe strong hand clearly with18-19hcp .2-I don't like that style due to waste of space.3-4-:I prefer wolff signoff convention,very easier to resolve this sort of problems.1♦--1♥2nt--3♦3♠--4♣4♦--5♠6♠--all pass 3♦=checkback stayman with game force3♠=I have 4 card ♠4♣=cuebid with slammish4♦=cuebid with slammish5♠=trump quality ask bid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lipeng2076 Posted January 21, 2013 Report Share Posted January 21, 2013 对不起，请原谅我认为这个问题相对简单，并不属于专家级别的难题。1，我绝不认同1s。如果采用Walsh风格，再叫1s否定低限均型的非均牌，这是一个低叫叫品。而2nt是高度限制性地描述了准确无误的18-19大牌点的这样一手强牌。2，我不喜欢4s，因为浪费叫牌空间。3，我喜欢沃尔夫止叫约定，轻松解决了这些问题：1d 1h 2nt 3d 3s 4c 4d 5s 6s3d：逼局性高花重询；3s：我有4张S；4c：扣叫，满贯意图；4d：扣叫，满贯意图；5s：将牌质量问叫； 心烛老师功力深厚，行云流水简单化解了这类问题。4c好，应叫人听到4d扣叫，就担心将牌，5s一声，明了。对了，老师，请教3s后的4nt是否会被同伴理解为定量呢，谢谢！ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lycier Posted January 21, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2013 就是示量叫品，只不过是含5张♥的示量叫品而已。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lycier Posted January 21, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2013 木子翻译得很好，再次表示感谢。多看看英语论坛上老外的讨论，很受启发，欣赏异域精彩的思想，则此生不负热爱一回桥牌！而一辈子局限于方块字，那就不免滋生狭隘，遗憾的。您说呢？！ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.