lycier Posted January 10, 2013 Report Share Posted January 10, 2013 [hv=pc=n&s=sakq6542hkjdqj4cq&w=s98ht543dt8ckj764&n=sj7h9762d652cat98&e=st3haq8dak973c532&d=w&v=0&b=8&a=pp1ddp1h2d3nppp]399|300[/hv] 昨晚24副TM，这是最后一幅。 If you have a choice of reasonable bids and one of them is 3NT, then bid it. Known as "Hamman's Law"哈曼法则：如果你可以选择一些合理的叫品时，其中之一是3NT，那么就叫它！这是一幅哈曼法则下的精彩TM牌例。如果定约4♠，那么这牌就连个打成的机会都没有。可以定约3nt就不同了，稳拿9墩。请大家品茗。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sungh Posted January 10, 2013 Report Share Posted January 10, 2013 老师的图片，仅限百度用户内部交流使用。我看到的是这个图片。http://img7.itiexue.net/1596/15969115.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lipeng2076 Posted January 13, 2013 Report Share Posted January 13, 2013 嗯 在同伴示弱后的封局3nt叫品 挺好的 比如您再叫2nt或者其他 要么选错高花局，要么丢局或者加大了同伴叫牌压力 坚实的高花长套保证了近局边缘的赢墩数 同时对同伴大牌要求不需太高 就打成了 学习了 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wuhuan Posted January 13, 2013 Report Share Posted January 13, 2013 佩服————我想都不敢想的叫品，要是我可能加倍后出套2S，同伴在高超的牌技也不会想叫到3NT，很有可能打4S。这400分挣得我佩服！如果你可以选择一些合理的叫品时，其中之一是3NT，那么就叫它！还是请老师在讲讲其中的牌理 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lycier Posted January 13, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 13, 2013 wuhuan,请您复习阅读：哈曼法则之我见，里面有详尽的讨论。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
601821297 Posted January 14, 2013 Report Share Posted January 14, 2013 我是不敢叫3NT滴，担心C呢 :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
haikuo Posted January 14, 2013 Report Share Posted January 14, 2013 叫的好,对牌的认识 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lycier Posted January 15, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 15, 2013 我是不敢叫3NT滴，担心C呢 :P 南北家就是3ntmk和我，我替3ntmk做分析：1）无人叫过♣，何况在有机会叫出♣时也无人有能力叫出。2）开叫人再叫是2♦而不是2♣南家在加倍是本有的满贯兴趣，在北家被迫应叫1♥后转化为寻求最佳约定，那么，南家有理由不担心♣而是要考虑在进局方式是有2个叫品：3nt和4♠，而叫牌的进程上不难判断3nt是概率更大的尝试！就叫3nt！而选择4♠，那么南家的♦QJ是费点，对于打有将牌定约，几无用处。这就造成估值的损失。反而打3nt，DQJ可以帮助制造一枚金光闪闪的赢墩，是有效的点力。最终顺利拿到9枚赢墩。也就是说：打4S定约，DQJ一墩都拿不到，打无将时，稳拿一墩。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madongjun Posted January 18, 2013 Report Share Posted January 18, 2013 合乎逻辑的选择！叫得好。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sungh Posted January 18, 2013 Report Share Posted January 18, 2013 南北家就是3ntmk和我，我替3ntmk做分析：1）无人叫过♣，何况在有机会叫出♣时也无人有能力叫出。2）开叫人再叫是2♦而不是2♣南家在加倍是本有的满贯兴趣，在北家被迫应叫1♥后转化为寻求最佳约定，那么，南家有理由不担心♣而是要考虑在进局方式是有2个叫品：3nt和4♠，而叫牌的进程上不难判断3nt是概率更大的尝试！就叫3nt！而选择4♠，那么南家的♦QJ是费点，队友打有奖牌而已，几无用处。这就造成估值的损失。反而打3nt，DQJ可以帮助制造一枚金光闪闪的赢墩，是有效的点力。最终顺利拿到9枚赢墩精彩的分析，加深了对哈曼法则的理解！ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lycier Posted March 4, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 4, 2013 注意废物利用，当手中被高估值的QJ软实力过多时，无将较为适合；当硬实力多时，有将牌的成功概率好一点。细细品味个中的道理，衡量进局方式的选择，恰是发挥二盖一体系的优势所在。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xuefeier Posted March 7, 2013 Report Share Posted March 7, 2013 请ER老师再讲讲为什么不担心C止 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lycier Posted March 7, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 7, 2013 请ER老师再讲讲为什么不担心C止 啊，是雪菲儿提问啊，请参阅8楼的解释。从叫牌进程和心理角度看，我坚信♣Q更是一枚不会让人失望的软实力止张。其实就算没有这枚Q我也愿意冲向3nt定约的。学会透视未见的牌张分布是读牌技巧的表现，也是重要的一门必修课，需要长期的经验积累，这才是应有的牌感吧。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yehuang Posted March 18, 2013 Report Share Posted March 18, 2013 直接叫3NT，还是有点不太够，加倍再叫2NT就是很强的牌了，北持有5点，当然会进局。这牌直接3NT，同伴要是真的没点，你可能会死得很难看。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cqwbc Posted March 18, 2013 Report Share Posted March 18, 2013 If you have a choice of reasonable bids and one of them is 3NT, then bid it.如果3NT是你可选择的合理叫品之一，那么就叫它！ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
00master Posted March 18, 2013 Report Share Posted March 18, 2013 绝好的牌例，拿着7张坚固高花套也未必选择打4阶高花。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hejiang Posted March 19, 2013 Report Share Posted March 19, 2013 四明手此牌例确实很好，学习了。我在想如果是我会这么叫吗？仔细看此牌例叫牌进程，凭心而论，我会探查进局或上冠，理由有：我加倍后敌下家没动静，弱牌，敌上家连叫2口D，实力也是一般,就此看来已经基本有一局，而PD仅叫了1H，S是否有支持?D是否有单缺?完全有机会、有必要探查。这时叫3NT已经没有机会让PD表达，直接3NT本身就是一个赌博叫品，在80%可能高花成局情况下我不会直接叫3NT。3NT本身就是双刃剑，有的有将成局定约打不成，3NT轻松做成，而有时3NT做不成的，有将定约却可做成，只是把握好机会才好. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xuefeier Posted March 19, 2013 Report Share Posted March 19, 2013 谢谢ER老师的分析 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dillon561 Posted March 25, 2013 Report Share Posted March 25, 2013 [hv=pc=n&s=sakq6542hkjdqj4cq&w=s98ht543dt8ckj764&n=sj7h9762d652cat98&e=st3haq8dak973c532&d=w&v=0&b=8&a=pp1ddp1h2d3nppp]399|300[/hv] 昨晚24副TM，这是最后一幅。 If you have a choice of reasonable bids and one of them is 3NT, then bid it. Known as "Hamman's Law"哈曼法则：如果你可以选择一些合理的叫品时，其中之一是3NT，那么就叫它！这是一幅哈曼法则下的精彩TM牌例。如果定约4♠，那么这牌就连个打成的机会都没有。可以定约3nt就不同了，稳拿9墩。请大家品茗。恩,我在实战中遇到的一副牌就是把哈曼法则忘掉了,牌如下:[hv=pc=n&s=s763ht9752dak5cj7&w=s2hak83dj73ckqt63&n=sj985hqj4dq984c52&e=sakqt4h6dt62ca984&d=e&v=n&b=2&a=1sp2cp3cp3hp3sp]399|300[/hv]我坐西,PD3♠后我就该3NT,但我看见PD没显示D有止张,也没仔细想就叫了4C.这把我错误大,其实最好最正确的叫品就该是3NT!另外一副BBO实战牌,我坐西,我不知道是否符合,但我觉得可以.请看牌: [hv=pc=n&s=s763h65dk7ca97654&w=saj94haqtd654ckt3&n=skhkj84dqt932cj82&e=sqt852h9732daj8cq&d=s&v=n&b=15&a=p1cp1sp2sp3dp3np]399|300[/hv]3NT是最佳选择吗?D三张小,PD3♦邀叫这是不好的一种配合,但我觉得我H的AQ10间张对打3NT有好处,3NT该是个不错的选择. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.