blackshoe Posted January 1, 2013 Report Share Posted January 1, 2013 Isn't "bloated bureaucracy" redundant? :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilKing Posted January 1, 2013 Report Share Posted January 1, 2013 Isn't "bloated bureaucracy" redundant? :lol: Doubt they will ever be made redundant. :( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackshoe Posted January 1, 2013 Report Share Posted January 1, 2013 Oh, good. I'd forgotten the English meaning to "redundant" when I wrote that. :D The first amendment to the US Constitution begins "Congress shall make no law abridging the Right of the People…" It has been suggested that the Founders should have put a period after the word "law". Works for me. :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pirate22 Posted January 1, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 1, 2013 One of the worst decisions the cash cow EBU ever made-to charge a fee for attending a live club to play bridge.. although it was explained what was behind the scheme,and a free vote,but it closed down a lot of small clubs,wuth no discretion for pensioners and persons of very low incomes and pension's, Ned Paul campaigned extensively against the proposal. Must say the extra information coming in on this topic is interesting..and informative BBL must examine this . Regards all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vampyr Posted January 1, 2013 Report Share Posted January 1, 2013 One of the worst decisions the cash cow EBU ever made-to charge a fee for attending a live club to play bridge.. although it was explained what was behind the scheme,and a free vote,but it closed down a lot of small clubs,wuth no discretion for pensioners and persons of very low incomes and pension's, Ned Paul campaigned extensively against the proposal. Must say the extra information coming in on this topic is interesting..and informative BBL must examine this . Regards all Why have clubs closed down? They have all had the option to disaffiliate. As for the bloated bureaucracy, there was a promise that shifting much of the administration to the affiliated clubs, the EBU would be able to streamline its operations. I do not know whether they have done this, but other comments on this thread suggest that they have not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulg Posted January 1, 2013 Report Share Posted January 1, 2013 It is a shame that Andrew Robson got to where he is now due to sponsorship by the EBU, and now refuses to affiliate his large privately-owned club. It's entirely possible that talent and hard work played a part and that EBU sponsorship played less than a 1% part. Maybe he feels his members would get insufficient benefit from affiliation to the EBU. When Robson came through the Juniors, funding was through the BBL (and representation was for Great Britain - not England or the EBU). The BBL staff numbered one full time and one part time person and they were able to raise sufficient funds for international events and training programs, and when people entered a BBL congress or simultaneous pairs, that was where almost all the money went. Sponsorship was more likely to come from clubs like the Young Chelsea, which offered free premises for junior training weekends and reduced membership and session fees. Now most of the money just pays for a bloated EBU bureaucracy.I'd also say that the EBU that supported Andrew as he was 'growing up' was a very different organisation to the one that exists today, probably consisting of just two and a half full-time staff. And if the EBU cannot get a large London club to affiliate, perhaps it needs to look at what it is offering. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted January 1, 2013 Report Share Posted January 1, 2013 Why have clubs closed down? They have all had the option to disaffiliate. As for the bloated bureaucracy, there was a promise that shifting much of the administration to the affiliated clubs, the EBU would be able to streamline its operations. I do not know whether they have done this, but other comments on this thread suggest that they have not.Because my club was a small club that charged negligible table money (you paid if you lost, was teams every week) that only had 2 tables (was 3 a while back). The only benefit we had from affiliating was to be able to enter club teams in the NICKO and Garden cities, we didn't award master points. Disaffiliating stopped us entering teams, and nobody wanted to do the extra admin, so we disbanded. This was for many years by a long chalk the best game in Norfolk, and you had to be invited to play, then to pay your £1 life membership. Everything was done to reduce the admin, the EBU didn't help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanoi5 Posted January 1, 2013 Report Share Posted January 1, 2013 Didn't a movie director recently reject an honour similar to this one from the Queen? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gordontd Posted January 1, 2013 Report Share Posted January 1, 2013 Didn't a movie director recently reject an honour similar to this one from the Queen?Quite a number of people choose not to accept them, but we don't generally know much about it because they are asked in advance if they would be likely to accept an honour if it were made. So, they aren't usually awarded the honour unless they've indicated they would accept it, and many of those who have said they don't want the honour keep quiet about it. The sticking point for many is the use of the words "British Empire" in the title. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonFa Posted January 1, 2013 Report Share Posted January 1, 2013 Didn't a movie director recently reject an honour similar to this one from the Queen? Danny Boyle, main organisor of the Olympic opening ceremony turned one down, as have a few others. Having watched the opening ceremony I'm not surprised as he hardly hid his left wing idealism under a bushel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mycroft Posted January 2, 2013 Report Share Posted January 2, 2013 Isn't "bloated bureaucracy" redundant? :lol:Well, we'll have to set up a standing committee to determine the truth of that and other statements. That will require a room, a secretary, several new "points of view", and, of course, meetings to determine the reporting structure and timeline...</Sir Humphrey Appleby, GCB, KBE, MVO, MA (Oxon)> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pirate22 Posted January 3, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 3, 2013 There were a lot of small clubs with say 40 members mostly players of the age 50 upwards, the rent was at modicum,td was usually a competent player,and table money was usually at a minimum to cover rental cost.plus EBU charged money for masterpoint certificates. Then the EBU in its wisdom,wanted to do away with paper masterpoints,so they wanted two pounds on top of the club table money {that was in some cases 100% extra} yes it was all announced, and a free vote ensued.Lots of members voted with their feet-and refused.they were really not interested in master points,anyway so lots of players dissapeared,along with the small clubs..... a crying shame. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted January 3, 2013 Report Share Posted January 3, 2013 There were a lot of small clubs with say 40 members mostly players of the age 50 upwards, the rent was at modicum,td was usually a competent player,and table money was usually at a minimum to cover rental cost.plus EBU charged money for masterpoint certificates. Then the EBU in its wisdom,wanted to do away with paper masterpoints,so they wanted two pounds on top of the club table money {that was in some cases 100% extra} yes it was all announced, and a free vote ensued.Lots of members voted with their feet-and refused.they were really not interested in master points,anyway so lots of players dissapeared,along with the small clubs..... a crying shame.I was under the impression P2P fees were about 30p not £2. the table money at the club I play at now is only £2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Uriah Posted January 4, 2013 Report Share Posted January 4, 2013 I was under the impression P2P fees were about 30p not £2. the table money at the club I play at now is only £2.Indeed, it was 29p at the time. And master points were included in that cost, so the real increase was only about 16p per person. If the club bosses tried to claim it was a £2 increase and this drove the players away then they're the crooks in this story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted January 4, 2013 Report Share Posted January 4, 2013 Indeed, it was 29p at the time. And master points were included in that cost, so the real increase was only about 16p per person. If the club bosses tried to claim it was a £2 increase and this drove the players away then they're the crooks in this story.Well it was if your club awarded master points, two clubs I used to play at didn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vampyr Posted January 4, 2013 Report Share Posted January 4, 2013 Well it was if your club awarded master points, two clubs I used to play at didn't. Yes, my understanding is that clubs which rarely held duplicate pairs but held other games are no longer permitted "direct" membership, and so cannot participate in the NICKO etc. This was a very poor decision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Uriah Posted January 4, 2013 Report Share Posted January 4, 2013 Yes, my understanding is that clubs which rarely held duplicate pairs but held other games are no longer permitted "direct" membership, and so cannot participate in the NICKO etc. This was a very poor decision.Your understanding is wrong, and also an odd non-sequitur from the post you quoted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Your understanding is wrong, and also an odd non-sequitur from the post you quoted.Yes, we could have joined, BUT would have had to participate in P2P and nobody was interested in doing the resulting admin. I believe the 3 8 board teams matches that we played on 2 tables rendered us ineligible for master points (not that we cared), and I'm not sure how the EBU would make use of the scores, not that they ever got put on a computer anyway. I also don't know how the EBU would deal with sessions that got cancelled as they not infrequently did when we didn't have 8. There was extensive dialog between our club and the EBU, and the EBU confirmed that basically we were stuffed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.