Jump to content

Go on or pass 4S


TWO4BRIDGE

Recommended Posts

I've got to get this off my chest... to quit thinking about it :

rightly or wrongly, Responder decides to use a modified Jac2NT:

 

Responder

Q 9 8 x x

A 10 x x

K Q x

x

 

1S - 2NT!

3H* - 3S**

3NT*** - 4C ( Ctrl cue )

4S**** - ??

 

3H* = 4 or 5 cd suit headed by at least an A or K, AND shortness elsewhere

 

3S** = next step asks shortness

 

3NT*** = shortness

 

4S**** = no stiff A or void AND no other card: A, K or Q

 

Responder now knows of an unavoidable -loser AND a possible -loser ( he knows 4-4 or 5-4 w/A and K but no Q ).

 

Should Responder risk going to the 5-level ( with RKC ) in hopes that partner has the remaining THREE key cards ( A K and A ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whether responder moves or not, RKC is clearly wrong. If partner has the remaining 3 key cards slam can still be basically playless even opposite substantial extras (AKJxx Kxxx x AKx )

I would have signed off over 3NT, but having made one slam try with 4C it has to be right to pass 4S now. AJ10xx Kxxx x KQx is a perfectly respectable opening bid, and 4 could be off, never mind five.

 

We are making slam opposite AKxxx Kxxx J Axx and it is quite playable opposite AKxxx KJxx x Axx but I assume 4S is non-forcing... if partner has really substantial extra values, I assume he woudn't have bid 4S.

 

On this hand wouldn't it have been better to show a singleton club?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...