Jump to content

Recommended Posts

However, if you want to play Namyats, you can play one of the following:

 

Option 1:

 

After 4 -

 

4 - you play it

4N (or 4 if you are kickbacking) = RKC

Other calls - cues

 

After 4 - 4 - 4

 

New suits are asking bids. I have no idea what 4N is, but I suppose it could be regular blackwood???

 

Option 2:

 

4 - 4 is Last Train

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Option 1:

 

After 4 -

 

4 - you play it

4N (or 4 if you are kickbacking) = RKC

Other calls - cues

 

After 4 - 4 - 4

 

New suits are asking bids. I have no idea what 4N is, but I suppose it could be regular blackwood???

We started out with that continuation structure, then decided to just use one or the other, and chose new suits including the in-between suit as asking bids and 4N as RKC. It seems to work fine because we never have two primes outside, and the quality of the focus suit is a given. (AQJ, KQJ 8th + a bullet; solid 7th + a bullet; Solid 8 + 0/1K; or AQJ/KQJ 9th + 0/1K)

 

For the times we just want to end in 4M, transferring back via the tweener suit creates two open books for the defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I play that 4[m] means 8-solid and out, or 8-one-loser and an outside A or K. The intermediate step says "if you have the broken suit, bid your outside card; with the solid suit, bid it". Given the tight requirements for 4[m] (which lead to forgets by one side or the other, but not to bad auctions when both remember), that and "standard" seem to Just Work.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I play that 4[m] means 8-solid and out, or 8-one-loser and an outside A or K. The intermediate step says "if you have the broken suit, bid your outside card; with the solid suit, bid it". Given the tight requirements for 4[m] (which lead to forgets by one side or the other, but not to bad auctions when both remember), that and "standard" seem to Just Work.

I always liked the ROMEX method where the major suit didnt have to be solid, when that way there was a good second suit

responses were based on controls in steps

signing off in suit showed 0-2 controls

first step 3

third step 4

 

this then allowed opener to use asking bids

 

frequency of this type of namyats hand is more likely then a solid 8 card major

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought after reading the forums you'd buy into:

 

3N = 8 - 8 1/2 tricks in a major

4m = natural

 

While this isn't technically legal, at some point it will be.

 

 

It's legal in most of the world including online, unless you happen to be playing in an ACBL tournament.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
The version of Namyats I first saw was restricted to either a solid suit, or a semi-solid suit with an outside ace or void. The main follow-up sequence was that bidding the in-between step is an asking bid, then 4M = side void; 4X = side ace in suit X; 4NT = solid suit. I do know that there are better methods around though.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The version of Namyats I first saw was restricted to either a solid suit, or a semi-solid suit with an outside ace or void. The main follow-up sequence was that bidding the in-between step is an asking bid, then 4M = side void; 4X = side ace in suit X; 4NT = solid suit. I do know that there are better methods around though.

Interesting. The way we learned (and play) it was Namyats shows 8 (or 8 1/2) tricks. Those tricks were solid 7 plus a bullet or 8 semi-solid. Having a void does not add a trick; tricks add tricks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...