Free Posted December 14, 2012 Report Share Posted December 14, 2012 Open the highest from two 5 card suits, no exceptions where you don't need any. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zelandakh Posted February 8, 2013 Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 Reading this topic always brings back memories for me. I learned bridge from Culbertson's books and he was typically extremely scathing of opening 1♠ with this hand pattern. Sometime in the 80s I managed to get hold of some "modern" books, dating from the late 60s and early 70s. All of these were British and all recommended opening 1♣ with 5-5 in the blacks. One of them did mention that there was a trend amongst American players to open the hands 1♠ and that, while this was illogical "it seems to work for them." Even now, I would suggest that the majority of British players still open 1♣ more often than 1♠ with this hand pattern. For myself, when I play Acol I still open 1♣ sometimes, typically with hands where I am willing to introduce spades even if the bidding comes back at a high level. Playing another system I think I would be less inclined to open 1♣. So I do think that the "this is obvious" answers perhaps stem in some part from not considering alternative systems. I would definitely say that there is a clear difference between British and American thinking here, even when the British players do seem to have made a definite move in the American direction on this issue. That coincides with a move towards 5 card majors and it is quite possible that these two things are directly linked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vampyr Posted February 8, 2013 Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 Even now, I would suggest that the majority of British players still open 1♣ more often than 1♠ with this hand pattern. Where have you seen this? It is not the done thing in London, but as bluejak likes to remind me, London is not all of England. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdeegan Posted February 8, 2013 Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 :P No real debate in my world. Usually you open 1♠. The big and fairly frequent exception is a good playing hand w/o enuf HCP to warrent a high reverse. Examples: AKxxxxKxJ109xxis a 1♠ opener - you are basically giving up on the anemic ♣ suit. AK1087xxxKJ109xis a 1♣ opener. You don't mind a ♣ lead. Even vul you are safe to rebid ♠ up to the two level even opposite passing partner. AKQxxxAxKJ10xxis a 1♠ opener since with 17HCP you can rebid 3♣ as a high reverse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MickyB Posted February 8, 2013 Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 Where have you seen this? It is not the done thing in London, but as bluejak likes to remind me, London is not all of England. I'm not sure I agree with "majority", but it's certainly not uncommon. While I wouldn't expect to see it at the YC, there are a lot of clubs with generally low-standard play in London as well, I'd be surprised if you frequented them but I've been surprised before! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zelandakh Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 Where have you seen this? It is not the done thing in London, but as bluejak likes to remind me, London is not all of England.I play regularly in the Acol Club on BBO. The standard there is distinctly lower than the major London clubs. Most play a rather traditional form of Acol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts