Jump to content

Exclusion Blackwood


Recommended Posts

Recently someone told me he didn't like the standard 1430 or 0314 responses after exclusion blackwood. Instead he prefers to respond even or odd. I haven't thought this through, but it may have some merit (especially if the auction is already quite high). Also, in many cases you can still ask for the trump Q. Your opinions and thoughts?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With either method you have no wriggle room when is the agreed trump suit and is the void suit. More often than not you are committed to level 6. With as the agreed trump suit and as the void suit, both methods should work equally well.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

even or odd just asking for a mess-up where your not sure how many KC's.

Yes and no. The thing is, when responder has 2 or 3 keycards you (usually) want to be in slam. Why else would someone start an exclusion sequence? So responder can 'zoom' when he has more than 1 keycard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I learned at some point that 0 1 2 3 4 is best as sometimes it's tricky to tell 0 from 3 (much more often than in RKC). Even/odd is a step in the wrong direction IMO, although I'm not sure whether 0314 is really inferior to 01234.
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends on how you use your exclusion and at what level, ours most normally occurs at the 4 level so 0314 is fine, if you tend to use it at the 5 level, you have less space, so even/odd may be better.

 

eg for us:

 

1-4 is exclusion but with 4 to show a minimum over which 4N is exclusion again, this means you have plenty of space.

 

If you have to bid 1-2N-3-5 as exclusion then you might want to play odd/even.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I learned at some point that 0 1 2 3 4 is best as sometimes it's tricky to tell 0 from 3 (much more often than in RKC). Even/odd is a step in the wrong direction IMO, although I'm not sure whether 0314 is really inferior to 01234.

Kanter recommends 012wo2w3 and notes that 3 is rare. One really has to wonder about 4 since that means the asker has a void and no key cards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I learned at some point that 0 1 2 3 4 is best as sometimes it's tricky to tell 0 from 3 (much more often than in RKC). Even/odd is a step in the wrong direction IMO, although I'm not sure whether 0314 is really inferior to 01234.

 

Are you serious?

 

01234 is by far inferior to RCKB. If you really face a descission where you are not sure, how many KCS partner holds, there is a quite simple solution...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exclusion at a prohibitive level can often be avoided. The player planning to take over can choose HOW she sets trumps. Setting them via splinter, then using your normal RKC bid (KB or 4N) is exclusion. Setting trumps via (say) J2N and then using your RKC is regular.

 

In cases where exclusion cannot be planned in advance, we could agree to explore slams without that toy.

 

Do not conclude that our splinters always show voids; only those splinters where we launch immediately thereafter.

 

1S-4D

4S-4N=exlusion.

 

1S-2N

Any-4N=Reg RKC (Responder might well have a stiff somewhere, but didn't knee jerk a splinter bid because she intended to take over from the outset.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kanter recommends 012wo2w3 and notes that 3 is rare. One really has to wonder about 4 since that means the asker has a void and no key cards.

No way I had no idea, I literally thought of that like 2 days ago and I was about to post it. Obviously 30-14 is better than 14-30 since partner pretty much always wants to bid slam opposite 1, but I can't remember ever having 3 in my life so I'm sure 0-1-1-2-2 is even better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you serious?

 

01234 is by far inferior to RCKB. If you really face a descission where you are not sure, how many KCS partner holds, there is a quite simple solution...

what is RCKB? do you mean 0314 exclusion?

 

ah 01122 sounds quite interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
even odd when responder is wide ranged neccesarilly (void honnors are useless) is certainly horrible. 012233 looks right to me, maybe 011233 is even better
Please explain what "012233" and "011233" mean.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...