Lord Molyb Posted November 30, 2012 Report Share Posted November 30, 2012 edit: messed up the code[hv=pc=n&e=skhakqt973daqj9ca&d=n&v=b&b=13&a=4cdp6sp]133|200[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdeegan Posted November 30, 2012 Report Share Posted November 30, 2012 :P 7NT - one of our major suits ought to run. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gszes Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 p is missing almost everything except spades and it is diffcult to imaginethis hand not having excellent play for 7s even though all we have is a singleton. 7n seems like it should also have a fair chance at success but if it goes down it might be by a TONand its hard to imagine 7s going down more than 1. p could have bid 4s 5s but went all the wayto 6s so i am willing to take out a bit of insurance against a bad heart split and maybe still allow us to make 7s by maybe ruffing 1h and taking the rest. The extra advantage of being able to do a ruffingfinesse with the heart T9 persuaded me). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmnka447 Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 If partner is not insane, partner must have a 12 card ♠ suit headed by the AQ and another card. Otherwise, he can't really know if slam can make be very sure slam will make. I'm bidding 7 NT to get to the safest slam. So long as we can run ♠s, 13 tricks are there. 7 NT removes the only possibility of defeating the grand -- a ruff on the opening lead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAce Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 I would place pd with 7 card spades headed by the AJ or AQ and a void (probably ♥ ) and having K in ♦ suit (depends on how good his spades are) and 3+ clubs If he has AQJxxxx (AQxxxxx)voidxxxxxx then he may not have ♦ K, but if his spades are AJxxxxx he probably has the ♦ K Some may think bidding 6♠ with only AJxxxx is nuts, but he is bidding under pressure after a heavy preempt and not expecting us to hold a stiff ♠ when we double 4♣, wouldn't you bid 6 with ..... AJxxxxxvoidKxxxxx AJTxxxxvoidxxxxxx ? Idk , maybe we shouldn't bid slam with this....perhaps i am overbidding again... If pd has hand#1 i constructed for example, we wanna be in 7♠ not NT But still, imo if we are going to bid grandslam, that should be NT. Not only it plays better in long run but also avoids suffering from a club ruff at T1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.