Jump to content

What gives you the best chance?


CSGibson

I....  

12 members have voted

  1. 1. What option do you choose

    • Splinter 4H, Planning on passing if partner signs off
      2
    • Splinter 4H. Planning on bidding again if partner signs off
      0
    • Bid a standard Jacoby 2N
      3
    • Bid 2C, plan on rebidding 3S next if possible
      5
    • Bid 2C, plan on rebidding spades as cheap as possible next
      2
    • Other
      0


Recommended Posts

I have a hand evaluation/auction planning question. You do not have complicated or extensive agreements with partner - you are playing 2/1, invitational jump shifts (not forcing), a standard Jacoby 2N, and standard limited splinters. Your cue-bidding agreements are italian style (A or K below 4N). Partner is moderately conservative, but is a very good flight B player.

 

Partner opens 1 second seat all red.

 

[hv=pc=n&s=sak93h6da6cqt5432&d=w&v=b&b=4&a=p1sp]133|200[/hv]

 

What's your best option to explore slam?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

old discussion here on the forums show clubs first or show 4 card sp first.

 

We are told pard does not open on crap and we have a 5 loser hand so 2nt first for me.

 

Will be hard to stop short of slam.

 

I mean give pard a nothing hand such as:

 

 

Qxxxx..AKxx...xx...AX

 

and we expect more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 then 3 invites control bidding - and we'll learn if partner can contribute anything in .

4 splinter at first appears more direct but I lack 2nd round control in and if partner has Q AK Q K we wouldn't mind being in slam even after a lead. Partner won't know that hand is good and will likely reply 4 ( duplication) leaving us short key information.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Playing 2/1 it seems best to start wth 2 and support spades later, especially if you are playing it Fred-style (with a 2NT response as a balanced GF). Playing my system I would show a splinter raise too strong for a direct splinter by starting with 2NT (3 is my Jacoby-like raise). There are pros and cons to both approaches that have been discussed several times.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

we need to know what partner has in clubs, you need solid agreements if you want to find out if partner has xx or x after 2 start, it is not stupid to start with jacoby and later do cuebids, but that creates other problems such as partner having Ax(x) where you lose K and a sie ace, as oposed to Kx where you only lose A.

 

With solid agreements I think best is 2+2. Starting with 2+3 will make it very hard to stop in 4 or 5 after blackwood so also has flaws.

 

Finally if all is flawed there is always the option to start with 2 and at least avoid the most dangerous lead :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...