Bbradley62 Posted October 8, 2012 Report Share Posted October 8, 2012 [hv=lin=pn|Bbradley62,~~M48603,~~M48601,~~M48602|st%7C%7Cmd%7C2S78JAH4AD57C4578K%2CS359TH589D29QAC2A%2CSKH236TJD468TJKCJ%2C%7Crh%7C%7Cah%7CBoard%208%7Csv%7Co%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7C1C%7Can%7CMinor%20suit%20opening%20--%203%2B%20C%3B%2011-21%20HCP%3B%201%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7C1H%7Can%7COne%20over%20one%20--%204%2B%20H%3B%2011-%20HCP%3B%206-12%20total%20points%20%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7C1S%7Can%7C3%2B%20C%3B%203-%20H%3B%204%2B%20S%3B%2011-21%20HCP%3B%2012-22%20total%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7C1N%7Can%7CBalanced%20minimum%20--%202-3%20C%3B%202%2B%20D%3B%204%2B%20H%3B%202-3%20S%3B%206-10%20HCP%20%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cpc%7C]360|270|[/hv]It's not clear to me what should be different, but the North hand definitely doesn't match the description of the 1NT bid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArtK78 Posted October 8, 2012 Report Share Posted October 8, 2012 I played some hands over the weekend in which (1) GIB CHO passed my 3NT call with seven spades in an auction where CHO bid spades one time, and (2) GIB CHO let me play in 3NT having 6-6 distribution! The funny thing about the second one was that 3NT turned out to be the winning spot, since I had AKJ in his 6 card minor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloa513 Posted October 9, 2012 Report Share Posted October 9, 2012 [hv=lin=pn|Bbradley62,~~M48603,~~M48601,~~M48602|st%7C%7Cmd%7C2S78JAH4AD57C4578K%2CS359TH589D29QAC2A%2CSKH236TJD468TJKCJ%2C%7Crh%7C%7Cah%7CBoard%208%7Csv%7Co%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7C1C%7Can%7CMinor%20suit%20opening%20--%203%2B%20C%3B%2011-21%20HCP%3B%201%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7C1H%7Can%7COne%20over%20one%20--%204%2B%20H%3B%2011-%20HCP%3B%206-12%20total%20points%20%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7C1S%7Can%7C3%2B%20C%3B%203-%20H%3B%204%2B%20S%3B%2011-21%20HCP%3B%2012-22%20total%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7C1N%7Can%7CBalanced%20minimum%20--%202-3%20C%3B%202%2B%20D%3B%204%2B%20H%3B%202-3%20S%3B%206-10%20HCP%20%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cpc%7C]360|270|[/hv]It's not clear to me what should be different, but the North hand definitely doesn't match the description of the 1NT bid.It should be allowed to bid 3♦ which is weaker than 2♦ on such hands. If it was weaker still, it should be allowed to bid 1NT which merely says 3-Clubs, 3-Spades, 4+Hearts 6-9HCP. A lot of descriptions are way too descriptive (restrictive). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarlRitner Posted October 9, 2012 Report Share Posted October 9, 2012 1C - 1D;1S - 2D; looks sensible. Walsh can be ignored with this sort of shape. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloa513 Posted October 9, 2012 Report Share Posted October 9, 2012 1C - 1D;1S - 2D; looks sensible. Walsh can be ignored with this sort of shape.Unfortunately they will never program that in as its too specific. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.