bluecalm Posted October 9, 2012 Author Report Share Posted October 9, 2012 I didn't played 3S as promising half stopper. I just thought it should promise it but had no agreement.I actually like what gnasher/others are saying here. I need to think a bit more about it and see what kind of hands are bad for half-stopper agreement and what are bad for 3S = no other bid agreement. My intuition for now is that this "2NT religion" is actually better way to play but as I said I need some more time. I will come back here with some summary/problem hands so we can have some more clarity on shortcomings of both methods. Thanks for interesting discussion so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted October 9, 2012 Report Share Posted October 9, 2012 Because they said so. See BlueCalm post 15. He didn't bid 3♠ because he played 3♠ as promising half a stop. I am trying to stop him converting to the No Trump religion.Bluecalm can probably look after himself, but I believe that you're doing him an injustice. In post 8, he said he would bid 4♣ with Jx KQTxx xxx AKx or Jx AQJxx Jxx Kxx. In post 9, I said that these two hands (but not the hand in the original post) should bid 3♠. In posts 11 and 16, he showed some interest in this idea, but didn't seem convinced. He has never suggested that one should bid 3♠ with J10 K10xxx K8x AK9. So, whoever it is that you're trying to save from this perversion, it's not Bluecalm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilKing Posted October 9, 2012 Report Share Posted October 9, 2012 Maybe I should bid 3S now with 2-5-3-3 etc as gnasher is suggesting. I actually like it and I think it makes a lot of sense it just was against my intuition at the time (which was that it promises half stopper). My bad. Just felt I had to encourage him not to go beyond "maybe". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluecalm Posted October 9, 2012 Author Report Share Posted October 9, 2012 Btw what is the downside of just bidding 2NT with Kx-1-4-6 kind of hands like:Kx x AQxx AKxxxx or:Ax x AQxx QJxxxx ? If we would bid 2nt with those then position after 3D would be much easier to untangle (leaving only hands without spade stopper there so only very suit oriented hands like xx x AKxx KQJxxx or 6-5's) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted October 9, 2012 Report Share Posted October 9, 2012 2NT says 3NT is probably our spot unless you have 3 clubs or 6 hearts, 3♦ says I really doubt 3NT is our spot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilKing Posted October 9, 2012 Report Share Posted October 9, 2012 Btw what is the downside of just bidding 2NT with Kx-1-4-6 kind of hands like:Kx x AQxx AKxxxx or:Ax x AQxx QJxxxx ? If we would bid 2nt with those then position after 3D would be much easier to untangle (leaving only hands without spade stopper there so only very suit oriented hands like xx x AKxx KQJxxx or 6-5's) I would not bid 2NT on the first hands unless I am playing full relay 2/1 - I think it's too strong. Maybe I should bid 2NT anyway, since it cleans up 3D. And I already admitted I am bidding it on the second, because I think the downside is small and the upsides several. If I'm 4-6, I'm generally bidding 2NT on hands where it's a) Very unlikely we can make 6♣ b) There's a pretty high chance that it is right to play 3NT from my side. But I probably don't bid 2NT enough. All the rest can sort itself out with the extra space we gain (the way I really play it, the auction starts 1h-2c-2d(various)-2H-relay, but 2NT is fine). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.