牌力评估

[shingkit]

Partner has 15 to a bad 19 balanced with 4 or 5 diamonds, which of these hands would you prefer ?

 

[hv=pc=n&n=sthqj52dqj9cj9752]133|100[/hv]

 

[hv=pc=n&n=sthq752da94cj9752]133|100[/hv]

 

I had an argument with partner about the evaluation of this and would be interested in hearing opinions.

 

 

Note to the Original Author of the thread: We have translated and reproduced your thread in Chinese below such that more chinese readers can read your thread, and benefit from your excellent questions and/or viewpoints. However, if for whatever reasons, you do not want your thread to be translated/reproduced in Chinese, please kindly let me know and i shall delete it as soon as practicable.

 

 

 

同伴有15点到差的19点均型牌，4～5张方块，你更喜欢下面哪副牌？

 

[hv=pc=n&n=sthqj52dqj9cj9752]133|100[/hv]

 

[hv=pc=n&n=sthq752da94cj9752]133|100[/hv]

 

我和同伴对此手牌的牌力评估有不同意见，因此希望听听不同的看法。

[yzdhy668]

两手牌都是7P，S单张，还要看叫牌过程，如同伴在S花色中点力较多最终定约是NT，第1手牌中间张好对NT定约有利；如同伴在S花色中无浪费点力最终打有将定约，第2手牌有DA第1轮控制对有将定约有利。

[U19]

我喜欢没A的那副，现在该担心的不是自己有没有局，而是对方会不会找到配合拉到3S；

没A的那副，能让我下定决心，放弃幻想，直接拉3D，而放弃高花优先的犹豫不决处理方法！

[madongjun]

没有叫牌过程，我倾向于第二副牌，最后的定约是♦的部分定约。由于♠太弱（同伴均型），即使你有19HCP，3NT依然比较遥远。

[shingkit]

The first one is more useful if we play in notrumps, because the diamonds will provide entries, and the hearts are more likely to be a source of tricks.

 

If we're playing in diamonds, I prefer the second, because I can take two ruffs without wasting any of my honours.

 

如果我们打无将定约，第一副比较好，因为方块能够提供桥路，而红心更可能成为赢墩的来源。

 

如果我们打方块订阅，我喜欢第二副，因为我可以在不浪费我的大牌的情况下将吃两墩。

[shingkit]

我个人比较喜欢海老师的想法。学习了！谢谢！

 

 

[dvd]

基于同伴是15-19的均型，1幅明显好于2幅，最可能的成局定约是3n或者4h，而不是5d。

无论3n还是4h我都喜欢拿第一幅，而第2幅唯有在打d将牌的定约时好于第2幅，因为可以用小将牌将吃s。