lycier Posted October 2, 2012 Report Share Posted October 2, 2012 [hv=d=n&v=0&b=1&a=4sdp]133|100[/hv] 1-基础知识：这个加倍是逼叫吗？ [hv=d=n&v=0&b=1&a=2hp3cp]133|100[/hv] 2-基础知识：这个3C是逼叫吗？ [hv=d=n&v=0&b=1&a=1c1h2c2dp]133|100[/hv] 3-争叫人的同伴叫新花是逼叫吗？ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waterismon Posted October 2, 2012 Report Share Posted October 2, 2012 1 no 2 yes3 no Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
21574770 Posted October 3, 2012 Report Share Posted October 3, 2012 第1，第3不逼叫是明显的，第2题意见恐怕不一定相同，应叫2ＮＴ或2♠是肯定要逼叫的，应叫低花，按老式叫牌法是逼叫，哈代21世纪2盖1建议不逼叫 :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lycier Posted October 5, 2012 Author Report Share Posted October 5, 2012 [hv=d=n&v=0&b=1&a=4sdp]133|100[/hv] 1-基础知识:这个加倍是逼叫吗? [hv=d=n&v=0&b=1&a=2hp3cp]133|100[/hv] 2-基础知识:这个3C是逼叫吗? [hv=d=n&v=0&b=1&a=1c1h2c2dp]133|100[/hv] 3-争叫人的同伴叫新花是逼叫吗? 全部都不逼叫。 尤其是第二问,相信会有分歧争议的: 打"标准叫牌法",3♣是逼叫的。 打哈代二盖一,哈代认为应叫3阶低花逼叫毫无道理,而应叫高花可以是逼叫。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmahpmah Posted October 5, 2012 Report Share Posted October 5, 2012 谢谢老师了。也明白了弱二开叫后，2nt是逼叫的 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madongjun Posted October 7, 2012 Report Share Posted October 7, 2012 我起先还认为第三种情况是逼叫的，看来认识有误。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wuhuan Posted September 3, 2013 Report Share Posted September 3, 2013 第三种情况，我的看法是敌方在争叫后加叫低花牌力（5-9),牌力几乎均分，所以不逼叫吧。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeartA Posted September 3, 2013 Report Share Posted September 3, 2013 第二题的3C，应该逼叫。用3C去试图改进2S，没有意义。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lycier Posted September 3, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 3, 2013 第二题的3C，应该逼叫。用3C去试图改进2S，没有意义。 我们使用的“非”标准叫牌法，具体例子请阅读：CBC训练赛：弱二开叫后应叫三阶低花不逼叫3♣不逼叫是哈代大师金口宣说的。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capacitors Posted September 3, 2013 Report Share Posted September 3, 2013 第一题值得商榷，其他不逼叫 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lycier Posted September 4, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 4, 2013 第一题值得商榷，其他不逼叫 我负责说：世界顶级专家的意见是：技术性的，允许转化为合作性惩罚。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeartA Posted September 4, 2013 Report Share Posted September 4, 2013 我们使用的“非”标准叫牌法，具体例子请阅读：CBC训练赛：弱二开叫后应叫三阶低花不逼叫3♣不逼叫是哈代大师金口宣说的。哈代除了他的“二盖一”书籍，在桥牌界并没有太大的建树。虽然“二盖一”逼叫进局这一体系被广泛接受，但绝对多数“二盖一”使用者只是用“2盖1逼局”这个概念（或者框架），很少有人把哈代的书作为金科玉律。 当然，用3C作为不逼叫也有优点，只是作用不大，也起不到阻击的作用。当有强牌的C套时，叫牌就会遇到困难。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yhql Posted September 5, 2013 Report Share Posted September 5, 2013 全部都不逼叫。 尤其是第二问,相信会有分歧争议的: 打"标准叫牌法",3♣是逼叫的。 打哈代二盖一,哈代认为应叫3阶低花逼叫毫无道理,而应叫高花可以是逼叫。 ☂People do not grow, they just learn how to act in public.人不长进，正因为他们只是学会了如何当众做表现。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
haikuo Posted September 8, 2013 Report Share Posted September 8, 2013 全不逼叫 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.