Jump to content

Machpoint judgement


bluecalm

Recommended Posts

Pass could be right but I would double, then bid 4 unless partner passes the double. If double is penalty I would just bid 4.

 

I would have preferred to bid 3 the first time. This isn't particularly sound but you can't afford to be shut out at matchpoints with this much shape, and it probably won't be any safer on the second round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried a simulation (1000 deals) with the following specification:

 

North: 0-4 HCP

East: 11-14 balanced

South: 6-7 hearts, at most 4 cards in a black suit. If only 6 hearts, either the hearts are at least KQJxxx or South has a void in diamonds.

South has generally the best hand and on some the 2 rebid looks like an underbid.

 

Under those conditions:

 

The average number of tricks West can expect in a diamond contract is 9.7 and 4 makes on 62.2% of all deals.

4 will be down 2 in 6.4% of all deals. There were no hands where 4 was down more

South can expect 9.2 tricks in a heart contract and 3 would make on 75.0% of all deals.

 

When 4 is down I would expect to get doubled or that 4 would be bid and made in about half the deals. That is less than 20% of the deals.

In 56%, when 3 makes 4 makes too. Overall it seems even red versus white at matchpoints 4 is a winning bid with this hand.

Pass is certainly not clear-cut.

 

Rainer Herrmann

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried a simulation (1000 deals) with the following specification:

 

North: 0-4 HCP

East: 11-14 balanced

South: 6-7 hearts, at most 4 cards in a black suit. If only 6 hearts, either the hearts are at least KQJxxx or South has a void in diamonds.

South has generally the best hand and on some the 2 rebid looks like an underbid.

I think that will includes lots of north hands where he would have bid 3 over 3 (such as three hearts and an honor somewhere), and lots of East hands that would have doubled rather than bid 1NT (takeout shape with xx or maybe Ax or Jx of hearts). I also think partner's range should have a top end of 15 or even 16 although I don't know how that would influence the relative results.

 

Personally I pass although I'm not confident of what's right. But at MPs I can't expect a terrible board for defending a heart partscore, especially after pushing them to 3, whereas I could easily get a terrible board by bidding 4.

 

Also I don't have a huge problem with the pass over 1 at this vul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pass leaving further competition to partner.

 

Backing in at 3 must show length and shortness.

 

Pard also knows I didn't bid 2 or 3 direct, so has some idea of what my hand may be.

 

4 is a shot. And if some in the field decide to bid 3 direct, opener may still bid 3 .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rainer's simulation also includes hands where partner will bid 4 if we pass.

I thought about this.

But if we will not bid 4 with a seven card suit and a singleton ace of heart, why should partner continue with a balanced hands and some diamonds red versus white?

It is not that the delayed 3 bid promised such a hand.

We know about at least a 7-2 fit and the bidding makes it likely that we will not find much heart duplication.

It is harder for partner to bid on.

 

Rainer Herrmann

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 is a shot. And if some in the field decide to bid 3 direct, opener may still bid 3 .

Agree. He might still bid 3. But, then partner will have decided to let opener do whatever he wants. We don't have to worry any more about taking shots. A sim is useful when we must decide something unilaterally; either because through no fault of our own we are in that position, or because we failed to bring partner into the process earlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If one bids on, I think the call is 3NT.

 

For me this is still natural, even though I did not bid it on the previous round and it pretty much shows this hand. Partner only leaves it in when suitable, and bids a confident 4 when he has seaweed.

 

I think South generally has 7 hearts here, and partner will often have Qxx and enough bits and pieces to bring 3NT home. I did a one-hand mental simulation and it produced the following:

 

Axx Qxx Kxx Kxxx

 

Opposite that, you might well sneak home 3NT, go down in Four Diamonds and conceded 140 against Three Hearts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...