Jump to content

A "D" problem


nikos59

Recommended Posts

The Bridge World magazine innovated some 10 years ago

by proposing the D problems in its Bidding panel, where

players were asked to choose among alternatives, but some

alternatives had further (usually tough) ramifications.

 

Something akin to a D problem happened to me last night.

 

You hold:

5

K

AKQ742

KQJ74

 

At IMPs/game all, pard opens a weak 2S. Next player passes.

It is up to you. New suits at 3 level are forcing, 2NT is Ogust.

No other understandings.

 

If you bid 2NT Ogust, partner will reply 3H showing a good suit

(2 top honours) in a weak hand.

If you bid 3 of a minor, partner will repeat his suit, 3S, denying

a fit (3 cards) and implying no other feature and weak hand.

If you bid 3NT, 4H, 4S, 5 minor partner will pass.

 

You are asked to bid now and also give your next move if

you choose any of the bids that have continuations.

 

nikos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bridge World magazine innovated some 10 years ago

by proposing the D problems in its Bidding panel, where

players were asked to choose among alternatives, but some

alternatives had further (usually tough) ramifications.

 

Something akin to a D problem happened to me last night.

 

You hold:

5

K

AKQ742

KQJ74

 

At game all, pard opens a weak two. Next player passes.

It is up to you. New suits at 3 level are forcing, 2NT is Ogust.

No other understandings.

 

If you bid 2NT Ogust, partner will reply 3H showing a good suit

(2 top honours) in a weak hand.

If you bid 3 of a minor, partner will repeat his suit, 3S, denying

a fit (3 cards) and implying no other feature and weak hand.

If you bid 3NT, 4H, 4S, 5 minor partner will pass.

 

You are asked to bid now and also give your next move if

you choose any of the bids that have continuations.

 

nikos

I love these problems, NOT :) :lol:

 

(Deleted; thought I read 2H, not 2S) Phil

Edited by pclayton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2N seems OK, since it apparently tells me pard has AQ 6th of his suit leading to 4 that looks tempting at MP's, but the defense will probably lead a spade, and looking at even Jxx of hearts, will punch dummy and promote a trump.

It seems clear from nikos's write up partner opened 2, not 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At IMPS, I will play this hand in 5 of a minor, starting with 3D and rebidding 5C.

 

This lose when pard has no aces.

The alternative (play in 4M) requires good partnership understanding on the meaning of "good suit": if it promises only top honrs, it is almost useless (e.g. AQ653).

I think "good suit" should mean = a suiit which will play for 1 loser even opposite a pard singleton or void, so it MUST contain good intermediates.

KQJT8x or AQJ98x may be such a suit.

 

With the latter agreement, bidding 4M is safer.

 

 

Without such agreements, it's a shot in the dark :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3d then 5c

 

agree with Prior except I know my partner will not have 2 aces, hope he has ace of spades.

And I agree with you !

 

My partner cannot have 2 aces in a weak two :)

The problem is not whether p has 1 or 2 aces (obviously not 2), but whether he has 1 or none: if he has 1, 5m is the best contract, if he has zero, 5m is unmakeable, and only 4S may have some play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 followed by 3N or 5.

Diamonds? Which diamonds? Oh now I see, you mean the diamonds my partner might solidify with his own high honor if only I asked him.

Game is not good. I need an ace and some help in the minors, and I would pass at MPs. There may be some stealing to perform.

If I get in with the K at 3N at trick one, I want to score one or two club tricks peacefully.

If I play 5 with a known spade singleton, I may also score that K if RHO holds the A.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is matchpoints, I bid 3NT over 2 (remember. matchpoints isn't like real bridge anyway.. hehehe). If LHO has heart ACE it rates to make as long as your partner has a little something.

 

At imps, you are too good to pass, as you will miss a vulnerable game. IF your partner never opens weak two with two aces, bid 3 then 5, as you can't afford to miss a vulnerable game. You are down if partner lacks an ace, but hey its imps.

 

ben

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could bid 4NT to see how many aces partner has, though it will probably be 1 or 0, and in the latter case I could be down in 5 with 3NT cold, partner having, perhaps KQxxxx QTx xx xx

 

The natural action is simply 3 given that it's forcing. Maybe on the above hand partner will show me his heart feature with 3 and I can bid 3NT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, in reality it was my partner who held the

problem hand and it was me who had opened

a vul. weak 2S with a minimum, an acceptable

one in my view:

KQ10986

Jxx

xx

xx

 

Yes, weak and balanced, but the suit seemed excellent to

me.

 

My dear partner blasted 4S which seemed atrocious to me

(sorry Fluffy, you can find atrocious my opening 2S).

This went an inglorious 3 down, mercifully undbled.

 

At the other table (same opening) they took a tortuous way to 5D

and went they arrived there our team-mates

knew enough to double. One down only, but 200,

so only 3 imps away.

 

Now that I think of it, 4S has the merit of being

difficult to double.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...