lycier Posted September 6, 2012 Report Share Posted September 6, 2012 敬爱的杰里: 请您谈谈对下面进程的见解: West----North----East----South 1♣------Pass------1♥------2♥ 您把2♥当成麦尔斯扣叫用以表示♠+♦吗? 提问者:路易斯 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
21574770 Posted September 6, 2012 Report Share Posted September 6, 2012 hi,世界级难题我没水平应付,书上也没现成的例子,要是我PD叫出此叫品的话,我首先认为PD是强牌,逼叫,可能有好的牌型,在PD已经pass过的情况下,没足够的牌点或牌型扣叫可能会造成灾难。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
150655941 Posted September 6, 2012 Report Share Posted September 6, 2012 我觉得是,但是是难题就不敢下结论,等待答案. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yin970902 Posted September 7, 2012 Report Share Posted September 7, 2012 West----North----East----South 1♣------Pass------1♥------2♥ 在我的眼里,是♥好套。RHO通常是4张H破套叫出来的。 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lycier Posted September 10, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 10, 2012 敬爱的杰里: 请您谈谈对下面进程的见解: West----North----East----South 1♣------Pass------1♥------2♥ 您把2♥当成麦尔斯扣叫用以表示♠+♦吗? 提问者:路易斯-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------你好,路易斯 West---North---East---South 1♣----Pass-----1♥-----Dbl 这类加倍是针对未叫花色的技术性加倍,S+D,至少4-4分布,暗示具有开叫价值。 West---North---East---South 1♣----Pass-----1♥-----2nt 大多数情况,这个叫品当成不寻常2nt,表示:S+D,至少5-5分布,一般是低于开叫价值。 既然有这样多的表示双套牌的方法,那么把2H当成任何一种形式上的技术性加倍似乎是多余的。 就搭档约定而言,我认为不论是2C或是2H都是自然争叫叫品,你所持牌面类似如下牌面: S:A83 H:AKJT82 D:94 C:Q7 右手家应叫2H,你也不应该打消自然争叫2H的念头。 或者 S:85 H:AQ6 D:93 C:KQJ975 你左手家开叫1C,难道你不应该有能力去作一个2♣自然争叫吗? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
601821297 Posted September 13, 2012 Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 精辟,学习了,谢谢老师的翻译 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wuhuan Posted November 29, 2012 Report Share Posted November 29, 2012 从加倍到2NT再到看似扣叫的2H,这一步步的分析太精彩了,谢谢老师! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madongjun Posted November 30, 2012 Report Share Posted November 30, 2012 桥牌逻辑啊,精彩! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.