Jump to content

How should this have been bid?


Quartic

Recommended Posts

[hv=pc=n&s=s972hajt6daqt952c&w=sa84hq9843d763ck6&n=skq65hkdcaqt75432&e=sjt3h752dkj84cj98&d=s&v=e&b=3&a=1d3h4cp4dp5cp5dppp]399|300[/hv]

 

3 down undoubled cost 5 imps (Butler). How should this hand be bid?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A double by North (what was West smoking when s/he bid 3?) would have worked nicely but that is not realistic. 4 is normal.

 

I think S should have passed 5. But North could have made it a bit easier for South by bidding 5 immediately. 4 followed by 5 might suggest a slightly more flexible hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing appropriate to say regarding West, but:

 

1) Maybe 5C was not available, or North feared it might be misconstrued. If it was available, Helene is right on.

2) It is probably not a good idea to keep bidding one's six-bagger when pard has shown more than that of his own suit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not make a negative dbl over 3H? If pd has a 4 cd spade suit you have found the right strain and now can worry about level. If pd bids 4D you correct to clubs. If pd passes it is your lead.

Partner passes with AJ10, xxxx, Kxxx, KJ, 3H bidder had xx, QJ109xxx, AJxx they made 2 overtricks with 6 solid, that's why you don't double, it grossly misrepresents your hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...