Jump to content

how to evaluate


yin970902

Recommended Posts

Here,'s control is another key element.

Or opening-lead will let 6 come to nothing.

I overlooked that. Responder could have been 5 6 2 void .....so maybe Opener would have to forgo RKC and just cue bid 5C over 4S ( and 4S should be slammish otherwise Responder would have signed off in 4H to play in at least the 6-2 fit ) :

 

1C - 1H

2NT - 3S ( GF, ostensibly 4s/4h )*

3NT - 4S ( 5s/6h )

5C - 5D

6S ( leap of faith )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AQ7

A2

1098

AKJ76

 

+++++

 

KJ983

KQ10965

4

3

 

Play 2/1;

PROCESS:

1--Pass--1--Pass

2NT--Pass--3--Pass

4--Pass--4--Pass

Pass--Pass

 

How to evaluate the bidding?

 

 

south forgot to show d control, ontop of that made a confusing 4h bid.....it confused north.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

♠AQ7

♥A2

♦1098

♣AKJ76

 

+++++

 

♠KJ983

♥KQ10965

♦4

♣3

 

Play 2/1;

PROCESS:

1♣--Pass--1♥--Pass

2NT--Pass--3♠这声3s应该表示5张黑桃(如果四张应该3d高花重寻),同时表达了6张红心,接着开叫人4c-4h(示弱止叫)-4s(修正)得到开叫人黑桃支持后,应叫人已经看清楚了,满贯前景只需核查联手控制情况立即4nt.

3s-4c-4h-4s-4n(双套rkc)-5d-5h-6c-6s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

♠AQ7

♥A2

♦1098

♣AKJ76

 

+++++

 

♠KJ983

♥KQ10965

♦4

♣3

 

MOSCTIO_2005进程

 

1C-pass-1D-pass(1C=15+;1D=9+,GF)

1H-pass-2NT-pass(1H=Relay;2NT=S+H,5/5+)

3C-pass-3H-pass(3C=Relay;3H=5-6-1-1/6-5-1-1)

3S-pass-3NT-pass(3S=Relay;3NT=5-6-1-1)

4C-pass-4D-pass(4C=Q-ASK;4D=5,A=3,K=2,Q=1)

4H-pass-5C-pass(4H=DCB,否定性扣叫;5C=H有两张大牌——AKQ为大牌,S上有一张大牌)

6H/6S //(可以推断PD的牌是SKXXXX,HKQXXXX,DX,CX,看来6M是好定约)

 

冰岛精确_2011进程

 

1C-pass-1NT-pass(1C=16+;1NT=8+,GF.5+S)

2C-pass-3S-pass(2C=Relay;3S=5S,6H)

4C-pass-4D-pass(4C=Relay;4D=5-6-1-1)

4H-pass-4S-pass(4H=Relay问控制;4S=1/2控制)

4NT-pass-5S-pass(4NT=接力,否定性扣叫;5S=H+S有A或K控制,H有Q)

6H/6S//(同伴牌张推理同上)

 

海盗精确进程

 

1C-pass-1H-pass(1C=16+;1H=8+,GF.5+H)

1S-pass-3NT-pass(1S=Relay;3NT=8-11,5S,6H)

4C-pass-4D-pass(4C=Relay,问余下牌张;4D=1-1)

4NT-pass-5D-pass(4NT=问A,5D=0/3A)

5H-pass-6D-pass(5H=问K,6D=同级2K)

6M //

 

个人感觉,海盗大牌问叫太占空间,没有DCB(否定性扣叫好手)比如本牌例,HQ就问不出来。

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Answering the OP question, I evaluate your bidding as very poor. How? looking at both hands slam is excellent and you missed it.

 

 

Seriously, north's 4 is stupid. Whatever he wanted it to show he doesn't have it.

 

I would have a much easier time starting with 1-1 and bidding like a 5-5. However after 1-1-2NT-3 where partner has shown a shapely hand with 6+(5?), 4+ north must bid 4 over it since it will be the best game avaible most o the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I would have a much easier time starting with 1-1 and bidding like a 5-5.

 

I was thinking the same thing:

1C - 1S

2NT - 3H ( ostensibly a 5-5 because a 5s/4h hand would go thru check-back )

3S - 4NT ( no issue about 2nd Rnd Ctrl in any side suits )

5C ( 0/3 ) - 5D ( Q-ask )

6C ( yes + K ) - 6S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...