Jump to content

Lead vs poorly explained 3N


Jinksy

Recommended Posts

[hv=pc=n&e=s9542ht8dj6532ck3&d=e&v=n&b=2&a=pp1n2dp3sp3nppp]133|200|Eventually described as single suited major[/hv]

 

(ETA description not appearing properly - P's NT is 11-14)

 

As my team was self-destructing at Brighton, this hand came up (IMPs scoring).

 

W's NT can systemically be any 5422 or 4441 in the range.

 

When I asked S for an explanation of the 2D bid, he became quite flustered, and couldn't remember (despite the fact that they'd been discussing it about 30 seconds before, unfortunately, while I'd been focussed on recording the previous score - he was quite elderly). After a fair bit of thought he bid 3S, and N pulled fairly sharpish to 3N. She then said to me that 2D had shown a single-suited major hand.

 

What would you lead (ETA and why)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My partner opened 1NT. (What range I apparently don't know.)

 

They made a 2 overcall which showed one major. A confused advancer bid 3 and then passed intervenor's 3N rebid.

 

Isn't hearts intervenor's suit?

 

I lead my 4th best diamond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...